Skip to main content
. 2013 Mar 25;2(1):40. doi: 10.5195/cajgh.2013.40

Table 1.

Weighted number of Non-Latino-White and Vietnamese with disabilities and corresponding estimate precision measures.

Disable SE MOE LCL UCL RU A
Non-Latino-White

Ambulatory 14,439,768 26,505 43,600 14,396,168 14,483,368 1% 3%
Cognitive 8,361,648 20,346 33,468 8,328,180 8,395,116 1% 3%
Hearing 8,224,412 19,041 31,322 8,193,090 8,255,734 1% 3%
Independent 9,932,839 36,643 60,278 9,872,561 9,993,117 1% 3%
Self-care 5,585,330 19,082 31,389 5,553,941 5,616,719 1% 3%
Vision 4,162,395 22,080 36,321 4,126,074 4,198,716 2% 3%

Vietnamese

Ambulatory 58,565 2,508 4,126 54,439 62,691 13% 5%
Cognitive 59,223 2,088 3,435 55,788 62,658 11% 5%
Hearing 31,431 1,509 2,483 28,948 33,914 14% 4%
Independent 58,259 2,248 3,698 54,561 61,957 12% 5%
Self-care 29,384 1,489 2,450 26,934 31,834 15% 5%
Vision 24,377 1,111 1,827 22,550 26,204 14% 4%

Abbreviations: A, percent allocated= (total weighted population ÷ weighted allocated count)*100; Disable, number of people reporting a “difficulty” with the disability related item; LCL, low limit of 90% confidence interval= (Disability – MOE); MOE, margin of error; RU, range of uncertainty= [(SE*3) ÷ Disability]*100; SE, standard error; UCL, upper limit of 90% confidence interval= (Disability + MOE).