TABLE V.
Agent and comparators | Outcome | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||
Fatigue change score | End-of-intervention fatigue score | |||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
Studies (n) | Pts (n) | Effect | 95% CL (%) | I2 | p Value | Studies (n) | Pts (n) | Effect | 95% CL (%) | I2 | p Value | |
Erythropoietins | ||||||||||||
All scales | ||||||||||||
All interventions vs. all controls | 14 | 3,037 | −0.52 SMD | −0.89, −0.14 | 96 | 0.007 | 2 | NSP | ||||
All interventions vs. placebo | 6 | 1,057 | −0.19 SMD | −0.32, −0.07 | 0 | 0.003 | 1 | NSP | ||||
FACT scale | ||||||||||||
All interventions vs. all controls | 12 | 2,587 | −2.98 WMD | −4.41, −1.55 | 79 | <0.001 | 0 | NSP | ||||
All interventions vs. placebo | 4 | 683 | −2.49 WMD | −4.06, −0.92 | 0 | 0.002 | 0 | NSP | ||||
Stimulants | ||||||||||||
All scales | ||||||||||||
All interventions vs. all controls | 9 | 1,240 | −0.16 SMD | −0.34, 0.02 | 42 | 0.08 | 13 | 1,287 | −0.09 SMD | −0.28, 0.11 | 50 | 0.51 |
All interventions vs. placebob | 9 | 1,240 | −0.16 SMD | −0.34, 0.02 | 42 | 0.08 | 12 | 1,263 | −0.08 SMD | −0.28, 0.12 | 53 | 0.44 |
Stratified by agent for all scales | ||||||||||||
Methylphenidate vs. all controls | 5 | 369 | −0.36 SMD | −0.56, −0.15 | 0 | <0.001 | 6 | 305 | −0.32 SMD | −0.80, 0.17 | 73 | 0.20 |
Modafinil/armodafinil vs. all controls | 4 | 871 | 0.01 SMD | −0.21, 0.22 | 36 | 0.94 | 5 | 905 | −0.04 SMD | −0.17, 0.09 | 0 | 0.51 |
FACT scale | ||||||||||||
All interventions vs. all controls | 7 | 596 | −1.35 WMD | −3.47, 0.78 | 50 | 0.21 | 7 | 424 | 0.80 WMD | −1.57, 3.18 | 0 | 0.51 |
All interventions vs. placebob | 7 | 596 | −1.35 WMD | −3.47, 0.78 | 50 | 0.21 | 7 | 424 | 0.80 WMD | −1.57, 3.18 | 0 | 0.51 |
Methylphenidate vs. all controls | 4 | 346 | −2.87 WMD | −4.68, −1.07 | 0 | 0.002 | 3 | 150 | 0.71 WMD | −3.18, 4.59 | 0 | 0.72 |
Modafinil/armodafinil vs. all controls | 3 | 250 | 1.24 WMD | −2.19, 4.68 | 49 | 0.48 | 4 | 274 | 0.89 WMD | −2.17, 3.94 | 3 | 0.57 |
Corticosteroids | ||||||||||||
All interventions vs. all controls | 3 | 165 | −0.43 SMD | −1.00, 0.14 | 67 | 0.14 | 2 | NSP | ||||
All interventions vs. placebob | 3 | 165 | −0.43 SMD | −1.00, 0.14 | 67 | 0.14 | 2 | NSP |
Outcomes using the FACT (FACIT.org, Elmhurst, IL, U.S.A.) were rescaled (multiplied by −1) such that higher scores reflect more fatigue. One study contributed twice: results were reported separately for the lymphoma and multiple myeloma groups (Littlewood et al., 200129 and Littlewood et al., 200642).
All synthesized studies were placebo-controlled.
FACT = Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy; Pts = patients; CL = confidence limits; SMD = standardized mean difference; NSP = no synthesis possible (too few studies); WMD = weighted mean difference.