Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Pain. 2017 Dec 2;19(5):455–474. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2017.11.005

Table 4.

Trial-level acupuncture characteristics, N=39. Counts for point prescription sum to 40 because one trial had two acupuncture groups, with each group receiving acupuncture based on a different point prescription.

Style of Acupuncture
 Combination of traditional Chinese and Western 9 (23%)
 Traditional Chinese techniques 23 (59%)
 Western 7 (18%)
Point Prescription
 Fixed needle formula 9 (23%)
 Flexible formula 18 (45%)
 Individualized 13 (33%)
Location of needles
 Both Local and Distal Points 37 (95%)
 Distal Points Only 2 (5.1%)
Electrical stimulation allowed 11 (28%)
Manual stimulation allowed 36 (92%)
Moxibustion allowed 6 (15%)
Other Adjunctive Therapies Allowed 8 (21%)
De Qi attempted (N=35) 33 (94%)
Acupuncture-specific patient practitioner interactions 16 (40%)
Minimum years of experience required
 No requirement specified (0 years) 14 (36%)
 6 months to 2 years 7 (18%)
 3–4 years 13 (33%)
 5–9 years 3 (7.7%)
 10 years 2 (5.1%)
Maximum number of sessions
 1–5 3 (7.7%)
 6–10 19 (49%)
 11–15 12 (31%)
 16–20 1 (2.6%)
 21–25 2 (5.1%)
 26–30 2 (5.1%)
Frequency of sessions (mean number of sessions per week)
 0.88 1 (2.6%)
 1 19 (49%)
 1.43 1 (2.6%)
 1.5 7 (18%)
 1.67 1 (2.6%)
 2 9 (23%)
 5 1 (2.6%)
Mean duration of sessions, rounded to whole numbers (N=34)
 15–19 minutes 1 (2.9%)
 20–24 minutes 11 (32%)
 25–29 minutes 6 (18%)
 30+ minutes 16 (47%)
Mean number of needles used (N=33)
 1–4 3 (9.1%)
 5–9 11 (33%)
 10–14 12 (36%)
 15–20 7 (21%)