Table 2.
Comparison of computational time between our model and Wang’s9 model under Case B.
Element type | Element numbers | Computational time of our model (min) | Computational time of Wang’s model (min) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | mean | 1 | 2 | 3 | mean | ||
Tetrahedral elements numbers | 12056 | 15 | 17 | 16 | 16 | 23 | 23 | 23 | 23 |
16840 | 19 | 19 | 17 | 18.3 | 26 | 28 | 26 | 26.7 | |
34988 | 28 | 26 | 28 | 27.3 | 32 | 32 | 31 | 31.7 | |
42938 | 30 | 32 | 31 | 31 | 38 | 36 | 38 | 37.3 | |
Tetrahedral elements numbers | 11853 | 13 | 15 | 13 | 13.7 | 19 | 19 | 17 | 18.3 |
15225 | 16 | 18 | 17 | 17 | 22 | 25 | 22 | 23 | |
16830 | 19 | 17 | 19 | 18.3 | 25 | 25 | 26 | 25.3 | |
19107 | 22 | 21 | 21 | 21.3 | 27 | 26 | 28 | 27 |