Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 24;12:103. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2018.00103

Table 5.

Linear contrasts of the differential effects of dietary n−6/n−3 ratio on cerebral cortex lipid content under different reproductive conditions.

Lipid class Main effects p-value 95% CI
A. Total Ceramides DI-SF (CO) 0.0001 230.1, 578.3
DII-SF (CO) 0.018 41.3, 389.5
DI-DII (CO) 0.024 27.6, 350.0
DI-DII (OVX) 0.707 −190.6, 13.8
DI-DII (OVX–E) 0.007 78.8, 427.1
DI-DII (CO+OVX–E) 0.001 102.2, 339.5
[DI-DII (CO+OVX–E)]-[DI-DII (OVX)] 0.017 50.1, 450.4
B. dh-Ceramides DI-SF (CO) >0.00001 551.9, 1236.4
DII-SF (CO) 0.014 99.3, 783.8
DI-DII (CO) 0.008 135.7, 769.5
DI-DII (OVX) 0.577 −402.9, 230.8
DI-DII (OVX–E) 0.013 104.6, 789.1
DI-DII (CO+OVX–E) 0.001 216.5, 682.9
[DI-DII (CO+OVX–E)]-[DI-DII (OVX)] 0.010 142.3, 929.2
C. Total Sphingomyelins DI-SF (CO) >0.00001 500.9, 1082.9
DII-SF (CO) 0.013 88.0, 669.9
DI-DII (CO) 0.005 143.5, 682.3
DI-DII (OVX) 0.512 −355.5, 183.3
DI-DII (OVX–E) 0.023 54.4, 636.4
DI-DII (CO+OVX–E) 0.001 180.9, 577.4
[DI-DII (CO+OVX–E)] - [DI-DII (OVX)] 0.009 130.7, 799.7
E. MHC DI-SF (CO) >0.00001 432.0, 948.6
DII-SF (CO) 0.003 165.7, 682.3
DI-DII (CO) 0.031 27.2, 505.4
DI-DII (OVX) 0.323 −355.1, 123.2
DI-DII (OVX–E) 0.067 −18.9, 497.7
DI-DII (CO+OVX–E) 0.007 76.8, 428.8
[DI-DII (CO+OVX–E)] - [DI-DII (OVX)] 0.018 71.8, 665.7
E. MHC DI-SF (CO) >0.00001 346.9, 734.7
DII-SF (CO) 0.003 126.8, 514.6
DI-DII (CO) 0.019 40.6, 399.6
DI-DII (OVX) 0.589 −226.6, 132.4
DI-DII (OVX–E) 0.041 8.8, 396.6
DI-DII (CO+OVX–E) 0.003 79.3, 343.5
[DI-DII (CO+OVX–E)] - [DI-DII (OVX)] 0.025 35.6, 481.4
F. C18 GSO3 DI-SF (CO) 0.0001 519.4, 1343.0
DII-SF (CO) 0.019 93.1, 916.6
DI-DII (CO) 0.030 45.1, 807.6
DI-DII (OVX) 0.934 −366.0, 396.5
DI-DII (OVX–E) 0.001 321.0, 1083.5
DI-DII (CO+OVX–E) 0.0001 294.7, 833.9
[DI-DII (CO+OVX–E)] - [DI-DII (OVX)] 0.024 82.1, 1016.0

DI: High dietary n−6/n−3 ratio; DII: Low n−6/n−3 ratio; SF: Standard food. CO: Intact control female mice; OVX: Ovariectomized, placebo-treated female mice; OVX–E: Ovariectomized, estradiol-treated female mice. Data represented in Figure 2 were analyzed by 2 × 3 factorial ANOVA. In cases where the influence of reproductive status on diet action was absent and significant interaction between the factors was not detected, data from those animals were grouped to emphasize the main dietary effects. The most significant p-values and 95% confidence intervals are highlighted.