Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 27;9(5):640–645. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.12631

Table 3.

Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis for prediction of OS and PFS

Variable OS HR (95.0% CI) P PFS HR (95.0% CI) P
Univariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis
Age: < 60 vs. ≥ 60 0.479 (0.189–1.210) 0.120 0.435 (0.205–0.922) 0.030
Gender: female vs. male 1.437 (0.623–3.312) 0.395 1.620 (0.805–3.261) 0.176
Smoking history: yes vs. no 0.344 (0.146–0.808) 0.014 0.314 (0.143–0.689) 0.004
ECOG PS: 0 vs. 1 0.294 (0.087–0.994) 0.049 0.478 (0.206–1.107) 0.085
Tumor stage: IIIb vs. IV 1.274 (0.378–4.294) 0.696 1.342 (0.470–3.829) 0.582
Tumor size: < 3 vs. ≥ 3 cm 1.523 (0.674–3.440) 0.312 2.065 (1.000–4.267) 0.050
Mutation status: EGFR vs. ALK 1.547 (0.519–4.609) 0.434 1.930 (0.780–4.777) 0.155
Liver metastasis: yes vs. no 0.491 (0.144–1.669) 0.254 1.222 (0.371–4.022) 0.742
Bone metastasis: yes vs. no 0.737 (0.330–1.646) 0.456 0.761 (0.387–1.497) 0.429
Adrenal metastasis: yes vs. no 3.121 (0.419–23.258) 0.267 1.300 (0.397–4.260) 0.665
Baseline CTCs: < 8 vs. ≥ 8 2.739 (1.194–6.283) 0.017 3.084 (1.357–7.011) 0.007
Stepwise multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis
Smoking history: yes vs. no 0.227 (0.087–0.593) 0.002 0.301 (0.135–0.669) 0.003
ECOG PS: 0 vs. 1 0.216 (0.058–0.805) 0.022
Baseline CTCs: < 8 vs. ≥ 8 3.317 (1.360–8.092) 0.008 2.835(1.240–6.483) 0.014

Bold value indicates P<0.05 are statistically significant. CI, confidence interval; CTCs, circulating tumor cells; ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; HR, hazard ratio; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression‐free survival.