Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 7;8(8):2117–2133. doi: 10.7150/thno.22610

Table 2.

Overview of the advantages and disadvantages of micro-CT (Skyscan 1176), nano-CT (Subµ-CT Lab, Fraunhofer EZRT), UM (Ultramicroscope II) and LSM (LSM 510 meta) employed for multiscale vascular network analysis.

Imaging modality Suited applications Advantages Disadvantages
micro-CT ++ Coronary artery Medium resolution (µm) Vessel perfusion with contrast agent not always possible
+ Whole vasculature of the kidney In and ex vivo technique Signal to background ratio even with contrast agents not always high enough
++ Kidney artery/ veins Several blood pool contrast agents commercially available Acquisition time 1 h 45 min
++ Carotid artery Robust segmentation of vessel filled with contrast agent Raw data size: 13 GB, reconstructed data size: 0.3 GB-1.1 GB
High sample coverage (2 cm) or more with sub scan Movement artifacts of biological samples
nano-CT + Coronary artery High resolution (nm-µm) Vessel perfusion with contrast agent not always possible
++ Kidney artery/ veins Several blood pool contrast agents commercially available Acquisition time 1 h 55 min - 4 h
+ Carotid artery Robust segmentation of vessel filled with contrast agent, many contrast agents available Raw data size: 6.25 GB, reconstructed data size: 17 GB
++ Atherosclerotic plaque vasa vasora “Cell type” specific soft tissue contrast to distinguish atherosclerotic plaque tissue, fat and vessel Medium sample coverage (2 mm), depends on magnification
Movement artifacts of biological samples
Sample sectioning necessary for high resolution images
UM ++ Heart capillaries High resolution (1 µm-2 µm) Tissue clearing and bleaching of fluorescent signal
++ Kidney glomeruli Multi target-, color application, fluorescence proximity analysis Whole mount staining needs optimization processes
++ Kidney artery/ veins Homogenous Isolectin staining Raw data size 8.5 GB-43 GB, reconstructed data size: 6 GB-28 GB
++ Kidney capillaries Acquisition time 20 min-40 min Tissue shrinkage
++ Cell based matrigel assay No movement artifacts due to dehydration Segmentation of big vessel is time consuming
++ Matrigel capillaries Medium sample coverage (0.7 cm), sample sectioning enhance fluorescence signal intensity
+ Atherosclerotic plaque vasa vasora Decay of fluorescence signal over time
++ Atherosclerotic plaque capillaries
LSM + Kidney glomeruli High resolution (nm-µm) Sectioning is time consuming and destructive to the sample
+ Kidney artery/ veins Multi target-, color application, fluorescence proximity analysis 3D orientation has to be defined before sectioning and has and impact on results
+ Kidney capillaries Homogenous Isolectin staining Bleaching of fluorescent signal
+ Cell based matrigel assay Acquisition time 3 min-20 min Low sample coverage (~4 µm-50 µm/slide), observer-dependent as the analyzed region of interest is usually smaller compared to UM or micro-CT
+ Matrigel capillaries Many staining protocols in the literature available Tissue shrinkage
+ Atherosclerotic plaque vasa vasora Raw data size 0.01 GB-0.1 GB
+ Atherosclerotic plaque capillaries

+: suited; ++: well suited; CT: computed tomography; GB: gigabyte; LSM: laser scanning confocal microscopy; UM: ultra-microscopy.