Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Neurosci. 2017 Aug 14;20(10):1413–1417. doi: 10.1038/nn.4622

Figure 4. Fine attentional control during normal retinal image motion (Exp. 4).

Figure 4

Results of a control experiment identical to Experiment 3 (Fig. 3), but without retinal stabilization. Stimuli moved on the retina because of the physiological instability of fixation. (A) Accuracy (d′); and (B) reaction times for different trial types across observers (n=5). Error bars are 95% CI. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (Tukey HSD post-hoc tests. Sensitivity: valid trials vs. neutral trials, p=0.0010; valid vs. invalid, p=0.00004; neutral vs. invalid, p=0.0004. Reaction times: valid vs. neutral, p=0.0010; valid vs. invalid, p=0.00004; neutral vs. invalid p=0.0001). Conventions are as in Fig. 1.