Skip to main content
. 2018 May 1;13(5):e0196534. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196534

Table 4. Results of regression analyses and comparisons of the univariate regression analyses with the multiple regression analyses for each UFOV subtest.

Model Fit statistics p-value R2 or ΔR2 β’age β’pred
UFOV1 Linear F(1, 39) = 1.34 0.25 0.03 0.18
Quadratic Fchange (1,38) < 0.001 0.98 ΔR2 < 0.001 0.18 -0.005
VAfar best eye Fchange (1,38) = 0.08 0.77 ΔR2 = 0.002 0.18 0.05
VAnear best eye Fchange (1,38) = 0.88 0.36 ΔR2 = 0.02 0.17 0.15
Crowding intensity Fchange (1,38) = 0.08 0.77 ΔR2 = 0.002 0.19 -0.05
Contrast sensitivity Fchange (1,38) = 0.20 0.66 ΔR2 = 0.005 0.20 -0.07
UFOV2 Linear F(1, 39) = 2.77 0.10 0.07 0.26
Quadratic Fchange (1,38) = 2.45 0.13 ΔR2 = 0.06 0.32 0.25
VAfar best eye Fchange (1,38) = 0.38 0.54 ΔR2 = 0.009 0.24 0.1
VAnear best eye Fchange (1,38) <0.001 0.98 ΔR2 < 0.001 0.26 -0.003
Crowding intensity Fchange (1,38) = 0.72 0.40 ΔR2 = 0.02 0.23 0.13
Contrast sensitivity Fchange (1,38) = 0.28 0.60 ΔR2 = 0.007 0.24 0.08
UFOV3 Linear F(1, 39) = 21.91 < 0.001 0.36 0.60
Quadratic Fchange (1,38) = 1.17 0.29 ΔR2 = 0.019 0.64 0.14
VAfar best eye Fchange (1,38) = 0.01 0.92 ΔR2 < 0.001 0.60 0.01
VAnear best eye Fchange (1,38) = 0.06 0.80 ΔR2 = 0.001 0.60 -0.03
Crowding intensity Fchange (1,38) = 0.09 0.74 ΔR2 = 0.002 0.61 -0.04
Contrast sensitivity Fchange (1,38) = 0.082 0.78 ΔR2 = 0.001 0.59 0.04