Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Brain Stimul. 2018 Jan 31;11(3):501–508. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2018.01.006

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Identified significantly different MH FCs and their relationships with HAM-D improvements. First column: Compared to sham group, tVNS group had significantly lower FCs in rACC and MFG, while higher FCs in CB. Second column: real but not sham tVNS significantly modulated the strength of MH-rACC, MH-MFG and MH-CB. Third column: All connections in sham and real groups during resting-state were not significantly correlated with HAM-D improvements. Fourth column: Only the strength of MH-rACC in real tVNS group during treatment was significantly correlated with HAM-D improvements. ns: no significance; *: p < 0.05.