Table 1.
Comparison of factor structures.
| Model | χ2 | df | χ2/df | Δχ2(Δdf) | RMSEA | TLI | CFI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Five-factor model | 1020.45 | 340 | 3.00 | 0.07 | 0.91 | 0.92 | |
| Four-factor model 1 | 1643.55 | 344 | 4.78 | 623.1∗∗∗(4) | 0.10 | 0.82 | 0.84 |
| Four-factor model 2 | 1941.30 | 344 | 5.64 | 920.85∗∗∗(4) | 0.11 | 0.78 | 0.80 |
| Two-factor model | 3136.04. | 349 | 8.99 | 2115.59∗∗∗(9) | 0.14 | 0.63 | 0.65 |
| One-factor model | 3828.20 | 350 | 10.94 | 2807.75∗∗∗(10) | 0.16 | 0.53 | 0.57 |
N = 397. RMSEA, root mean square error of approximation. TLI, Tucker-Lewis index. CFI, comparative fit index. Five-factor model: employee experienced HPWS, OBSE, social exchange, job performance, and job satisfaction. Four-factor model 1: OBSE and social exchange were combined into one factor. Four-factor model 2: employee experienced HPWS and job performance were combined into one factor. Two-factor model: employee experienced HPWS, job performance and job satisfaction were combined into one factor; OBSE and social exchange were combined into one factor. One-factor model: all five factors were combined into one factor.