Skip to main content
. 2018 May 2;19:134. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2051-5

Table 5.

Spearman correlationsa between the ankle instrument scores, those for generic instruments and clinical variables (n = 567)

Instrument LEFS LEFS Adjustedb OMAS OMAS Adjusted SEFAS SEFAS Adjusted
OMAS 0.86 0.86
OMAS Adjusted 0.86 0.86
SEFAS −0.84 −0.84 − 0.89 −0.89
SEFAS Adjusted −0.84 −0.84 − 0.88 −0.88
SF-36 physical function 0.85 0.86 0.76 0.77 −0.74 −0.73
EQ-5D index 0.73 0.73 0.79 0.79 −0.80 −0.79
 Mobility −0.65 −0.64 − 0.66 −0.67 0.66 0.66
 Self-care −0.35 −0.36 − 0.32 −0.33 0.34 0.34
 Usual activities −0.60 −0.61 − 0.59 −0.60 0.62 0.62
 Pain/discomfort −0.64 −0.64 − 0.73 −0.73 0.76 0.75
 Anxiety/depression −0.30 −0.31 − 0.30 −0.31 0.31 0.30
ASA classification −0.26 −0.26 − 0.19 −0.21 0.21 0.20
Body Mass Index −0.15 −0.16 − 0.21 −0.19 0.14 0.15
Duration of operation −0.24 −0.23 − 0.25 −0.26 0.24 0.22
Uni-, bi-, tri-malleolar −0.23 −0.22 − 0.21 −0.23 0.21 0.19

aAll correlations are significant (p < 0.01)

bAdjusted scores where mean imputation is used for missing data when half or more items are completed