Table 5.

Multiple Logistic Regression between Anthropometric Indices and CVD Risk Factors

Variables	BMI		WC		WHR		WHtR
	(>17.5 VS ≤ 17.5)		(>80 VS ≤ 80)		(>0.8 VS ≤ 0.8)		(>0.6 VS ≤ 0.6)
	Unadjusted	Adjusted	Unadjusted	Adjusted	Unadjusted	Adjusted	Unadjusted	Adjusted
Hypertension	1.07 (0.69~ 1.65)	1.09 (0.69~ 1.72)	1.04 (0.63~ 1.73)	0.92 (0.54~ 1.57)	1.05 (0.49~ 2.27)	1.04 (0.47~ 2.29)	1.42 (0.6~ 3.21)	1.57 (0.66~ 3.71)
High TC	1.24 (0.60~ 2.55)	0.38 (0.10~ 1.48)	2.31* (1.10~ 4.87)	1.70 (0.49~ 5.95)	0.89 (0.26~ 3.07)	1.09 (0.14~ 8.72)	1.51 (0.50~ 4.56)	0.67 (0.10~ 4.58)
High TGa	10.59** (2.40~ 46.67)	8.95** (2.00~ 40.04)	4.24** (1.62~ 11.05)	3.66* (1.33~ 10.06)	–	–	3.13 (0.98~ 10.07)	2.62 (0.76~ 9.01)
Low HDL-C	2.30* (1.18~ 4.48)	2.16* (1.08~ 4.30)	1.95 (0.99~ 3.85)	2.02 (0.99~ 4.11)	0.84 (0.28~ 2.51)	0.81 (0.27~ 2.45)	2.87* (1.21~ 6.78)	3.11* (1.26~ 7.68)
High LDL-C	2.16* (1.03~ 4.54)	4.44* (1.10~ 17.93)	2.31* (1.10~ 4.87)	1.45 (0.41~ 5.16)	0.89 (0.26~ 3.07)	0.82 (0.10~ 6.79)	2.02 (0.73~ 5.60)	2.67 (0.44~ 16.19)

Factors in Female Centenarians

The prevalence of hypertension, high level of TC, TG, LDL-C and low level of HDL-C were demonstrated according to anthropometric indices (BMI, WC, WHR, WHtR)

The cut-off points for dyslipidemia were plasma TC ≥ 240 mg/dl and/or use of medications to lower blood cholesterol for high TC, TG ≥ 200 mg/dl for high TG, HDL-C<40 mg/dl for low HDL-C, and LDL-C ≥ 160 mg/dl and/or use of medications to lower blood cholesterol for high LDL-C

According to the level of anthropometric indices, two-class classification was used for grouping (BMI (>17.5 VS ≤ 17.5), WC (>80 VS ≤ 80), WHR (>0.8 VS ≤ 0.8), WHtR (>0.6 VS ≤ 0.6))

The odds ratios were presented as unadjusted and further adjusted for age, illiterate, windowed, Han nationality, smoker, alcohol drinker, tea drinker and No. of children

^aA very few centenarian with concentration of TG higher than 200 mg/dl in WHR ≤ 0.8 group thus the data showed infinity in this column

*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01