Skip to main content
. 2018 May 2;13:106. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0814-1

Table 1.

Measurements comparison between TAD, CalTAD and TADcalTAD

Specificity Sensitivity PPV VPN
Estimate 95% CI Estimate 95% CI
TAD 0.59 0.42–0.76 1 0.22 1
CalTAD 0.492 0.32–0.66 1 0.18 1
TADcalTAD 0.541 0.37–0.71 1 0.2 1

CI confidence interval, PPV positive predictive value, VPN negative predictive value