Table 5.
Characteristics of participants
| QUESTION (number of participants who viewed the question) | No. | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Eligible accounts (N = 783)a | ||
| < 20 recordsb | 532 | 68% |
| 20–99 records | 138 | 18% |
| ≥ 100 records | 113 | 14% |
| Participants (N = 366) | ||
| < 20 records | 191 | 52% |
| 20–99 records | 77 | 21% |
| ≥ 100 records | 98 | 27% |
| Is the PRS account affiliated with a CTSA? (N = 366) | ||
| Yes (selected a CTSA) | 109 | 30% |
| No (selected “Not applicable”) | 211 | 58% |
| Skipped (did not answer) | 46 | 13% |
| Is the PRS account affiliated with one or more of the following? (N = 366)a | ||
| NCI cancer center | 62 | 17% |
| Other cancer center (not NCI designated)c | 37 | 10% |
| Medical school | 100 | 27% |
| Teaching hospital | 138 | 38% |
| Other schoolsd | 107 | 29% |
| Other | 172 | 47% |
| Selected “Don’t know” | 19 | 5% |
| Skipped (did not answer) | 2 | < 1% |
aBecause participants could “check all that apply,” the sum of all categories exceeds the number of accounts that participated (i.e., some participants selected multiple responses)
bRecords include studies for which the organization was listed as the “lead sponsor” and the study was conducted in the USA; that is, we excluded records for which the principal investigator (PI) was the “lead sponsor,” and we excluded studies done outside the USA
cTwo accounts selected both an “NCI cancer center” and an “Other cancer center”; thus, 97 accounts were affiliated with a cancer center
d “Other schools” include: school of public health (N = 59, 16%), school of social work (N = 41, 11%), school of arts and sciences (N = 56, 15%), school of nursing (N = 72, 20%), school of dentistry (N = 40, 11%)