Skip to main content
. 2018 May 2;18:68. doi: 10.1186/s12935-018-0562-7

Table 2.

Subgroup analysis of pooled HRs for OS in cancer patients with abnormal expression level of CXCL5

Subgroup analysis No. of cohorts Pooled HRs Meta regression (p value) Heterogeneity
Random I2 (%) p value
Sample size 0.602
 < 100 8 1.60 [0.81–3.17] 70.9 0.001
 ≥ 100 9 1.69 [1.37–2.08] 62.0 0.007
Type of cancer 0.197
 Digestive system carcinoma 10 1.78 [1.39–2.28] 45.3 0.058
 Non-digestive system carcinoma 7 1.59 [1.09–2.31] 64.0 0.011
Follow-up time 0.204
 < 100 10 1.75 [1.32–2.32] 69.6 0.001
 ≥ 100 7 1.60 [1.07–2.39] 58.6 0.024
Samples detected 0.186
 Blood 3 1.90 [1.31–2.76] 0.0 0.680
 Tissue 14 1.65 [1.28–2.12] 69.8 0.000
NOS score 0.526
  ≥ 7 12 1.71 [1.36–2.15] 49.6 0.026
 < 7 5 1.82 [1.10–2.99] 57.2 0.053
Source of HR 0.209
 Directly 10 1.61 [1.24–2.09] 72.2 0.000
 Indirectly 7 1.91 [1.27–2.88] 38.6 0.134