Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 May 2.
Published in final edited form as: Commun Monogr. 2017 Nov 24;85(2):181–202. doi: 10.1080/03637751.2017.1404618

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Parameters shown on the paths are standardized regression weights; intraclass correlations appear on the dotted, grey, double-headed arrows. The goodness of fit indices for the revised model are χ2(28, N = 133 couples) = 28.86, p = .43, SRMR = .05, RMSEA = .02, 90% CI [.00, .07]. All of the path estimates were statistically significant at p < .05, one-tailed. The intraclass coefficients were statistically significant at p < .05, one-tailed. “S-” designates the spouse's variables.