Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Adolesc Health. 2018 Mar 2;62(5):618–625. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.12.001

Table 4.

Proportion of adolescent drivers who talked on a handheld device while driving at least once in the 30 days before the survey by the presence of a state universal handheld calling ban

Characteristic Presence of a universal handheld calling ban Totala
N
Engaged in behaviorb
N Percent
Entire sample Present 449 73 16.3
Absent 1,277 505 39.5
Overall 1,726 578 33.5
Age(y)
 16–17 Present 323 45 13.9
Absent 943 330 35.0
Overall 1,266 375 29.6
 18 Present 126 28 22.2
Absent 334 175 52.4
Overall 460 203 44.1
Sex
 Male Present 218 34 15.6
Absent 640 265 41.4
Overall 858 299 34.8
 Female Present 231 39 16.9
Absent 637 240 37.7
Overall 868 279 32.1
Race/ethnicity
 White, non-Hispanic Present 265 37 14.0
Absent 900 388 43.1
Overall 1,165 425 36.5
 Other Present 184 36 19.6
Absent 377 117 31.0
Overall 561 153 27.3
Location
 Urban Present 419 65 15.5
Absent 1,044 392 37.5
Overall 1,463 457 31.2
 Rural Present 30 8 26.7
Absent 233 113 48.5
Overall 263 121 46.0
a

This number is the total number (N) of respondents who answered the study questions by the presence or the absence of a universal handheld calling ban in their state at time of survey. The term “overall” implies the total number of respondents in the subgroup regardless of ban status.

b

This is the number and percentage of respondents who reported to engage in handheld conversations out of the total number of respondents to the questions by ban status.