Abstract
To examine the effects of luseogliflozin, a sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, on pancreatic beta cell mass in db/db mice of different ages. db/db mice aged 6, 10, 14 and 24 weeks old were fed either standard chow (control group) or standard chow containing 0.01% luseogliflozin (luseo group). After 4 weeks, immunohistochemistry and gene expression tests were conducted. In 6-week-old db/db mice, immunohistochemistry revealed a significant increase in beta cell mass in the luseo group compared with the control group after 4 weeks of treatment. Gene expression profiling of isolated islets showed upregulation Mafa, Pdx1, Ki67 and Ccnd2 in the luseo group. Beta cell mass decreased with age in db/db mice in the control group. Beta cell mass in the luseo group significantly increased compared with the control group regardless of age, although beta cell mass in the 28-week-old luseo group (4 weeks of treatment in 24-week-old db/db mice) was significantly lower than in the 10-week-old luseo group (4 weeks of treatment in 6-week-old db/db mice). Luseogliflozin preserved beta cell mass in db/db mice. The protective effect was more evident in the earlier phase of diabetes.
Introduction
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) is characterized by insulin resistance in tissues including the liver, skeletal muscle and adipose tissue, and by impaired pancreatic beta cell function1. To maintain normal blood glucose with insulin resistance, beta cell mass and/or insulin secretion increase as a compensatory mechanism. Beta cell mass in T2D is insufficient to compensate for insulin demands2. Human studies suggest that beta cell mass in patients with T2D, regardless of body mass, decreases compared with healthy subjects3,4, and obese patients with impaired fasting glucose also show decreased beta cell mass3. The United Kingdom Prospective Diabetic Study has suggested that deterioration of pancreatic beta cell function becomes apparent several years before a diagnosis of T2D and is part of the natural history of T2D progression5.
The db/db mice carry a deleterious point mutation in the leptin receptor gene. This animal is used as a model of T2D, showing both obesity and increased insulin resistance. Beta cell mass in db/db mice declines with advancing age6,7. Early protection of pancreatic beta cells is crucial for preventing both beta cell loss and dysfunction.
Sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors improve glucose tolerance by suppressing renal glucose reabsorption without direct pharmacological action on pancreatic beta cells8–11. The absence of SGLT2 in db/db mice prevented a reduction in beta cell mass and preserved glucose-stimulated insulin secretion12. Chronic treatment with an SGLT2 inhibitor for 4 weeks has been reported to increase beta cell mass in 10-week-old db/db mice13. Nevertheless, the effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on beta cell mass in db/db mice at different diabetic stages are unknown.
The objective of this study was to characterize the in vivo effects of luseogliflozin, an SGLT2 inhibitor, on pancreatic beta cell mass and function in db/db mice. Moreover, to investigate the protective effects of luseogliflozin on pancreatic beta cells not only in the early phase of diabetes, but also in the late phase of diabetes, these effects in db/db mice of different ages were also compared.
Results
Effects of luseogliflozin on metabolic changes and glucose tolerance in 6-week-old db/db mice
To determine the effects of luseogliflozin on body weight and glucose levels, we divided 6-week-old db/db male mice into two groups: db/db mice fed standard chow (control group); and db/db mice fed standard chow containing 0.01% luseogliflozin (luseo group) for 4 weeks. Although there were differences neither in either body weight nor in food intake between the two groups after 4 weeks’ treatment (Fig. 1a,b), blood glucose levels significantly decreased in the luseo group compared with the control group (Fig. 1c). Both groups underwent an OGTT after a 4-h fast and the AUC0–120 min for blood glucose significantly decreased in the luseo group compared with the control group (Fig. 1d,e). To investigate whether the 4-week’s treatment with luseogliflozin per se might have contributed to the improvement in glucose tolerance, we performed an OGTT at 16 h after discontinuation of luseogliflozin administration. Similarly, the AUC0–120 min in the luseo group showed significantly improved glucose tolerance compared with the control group (Fig. 1f,g). To examine the effects of luseogliflozin on insulin resistance in db/db mice, we performed an intraperitoneal insulin tolerance test and found that insulin resistance improved in the luseo group compared with the control group (Fig. 1h,i). To assess the effects of luseogliflozin on beta cell function, we measured fasting plasma insulin and insulin content in pancreatic islets. Both the ratio of insulin/glucose and insulin content of pancreatic islets in the luseo group were significantly higher than those in the control group (Fig. 1j,k). These results indicated that luseogliflozin administration for 4 weeks improved insulin resistance and pancreatic beta cell function, resulting in the amelioration of glucose tolerance in 6-week-old db/db mice.
Effects of luseogliflozin on beta cell morphology in 6-week-old db/db mice
We investigated the effects of luseogliflozin on beta cell mass after 4 weeks treatment. Beta cell mass in the luseo group significantly increased compared with the control group (Fig. 2a,b). We then performed double immunostaining using anti-insulin and anti-glucagon antibodies. In the control group, some alpha cells were observed to have infiltrated the center of islets (Fig. 2c). In the luseo group, beta cells were centrally located and alpha cells were primarily located at the periphery of islets (Fig. 2c). When we calculated the ratio of the number of beta cells to alpha plus beta cells in pancreatic islets, the ratio in the luseo group significantly increased compared with the control group (Fig. 2d). We evaluated beta cell proliferation using immunohistochemical detection of BrdU. The ratio of BrdU-positive beta cells in the luseo group showed a significantly increase compared with the control group (Fig. 2e). The apoptotic activity of beta cells in the luseo group, analyzed using the TUNEL assay, decreased by 50.2% compared with the control group, but not significantly (Fig. 2f).
Effects of luseogliflozin on changes in gene expression of islets in 6-week-old db/db mice
We investigated changes in expression levels of genes associated with beta cell function in islets of db/db mice with or without luseogliflozin. The mRNA expression levels of Mafa, Pdx1, NKX6.1 and Gck (encoding glucokinase) significantly increased in the luseo group compared with the control group (Fig. 3a). Expression levels of Ins1 and Ins2, which are target genes associated with Mafa and Pdx1, significantly increased in the luseo group compared with the control group (Fig. 3a). Immunohistochemistry revealed that the percentage of Mafa-positive beta cells significantly increased in the luseo group compared with the control group (Fig. 3b,c), being consistent with the results of quantitative real-time PCR. These findings suggested that luseogliflozin improved beta cell function at the transcription level.
We investigated expression levels of genes associated with cell proliferation and the cell cycle. Expression levels of Ki67 and Ccnd2 in the luseo group, but not Ccnd1 or Ccnd3, significantly increased compared with the control group (Fig. 3d). Because we had previously found increased expression of NADPH oxidase complex, a marker of oxidative stress, in db/db mice compared with wild-type mice, the expression of genes associated with this complex were evaluated14. P22phox mRNA levels were significantly lower in the luseo group compared with the control group, and gp91phox and p47phox mRNA levels tended to be lower in the luseo group compared with the control group (Fig. 3e). Because the accumulation of oxidative stress in beta cells decreases beta cell mass and function15, these results suggested that luseogliflozin reduced oxidative stress in the islets of db/db mice, ultimately improving beta cell function and increase beta cell mass.
Effects of luseogliflozin on metabolic changes and glucose tolerance in db/db mice of different ages
The following experiment was performed to characterize the protective effects of luseogliflozin treatment on pancreatic beta cells in db/db mice of different ages. Male db/db mice (6, 10, 14 and 24 weeks old) were treated with or without luseogliflozin 0.01% mixed into the normal diet for 4 weeks. There were no differences in body weight between the control and luseo groups of different ages (Fig. 4a–d). Blood glucose levels of the luseo group were significantly lower than the control group regardless of age (Fig. 4e–h). Mice in the different age groups underwent an OGTT and the AUC0–120 min for blood glucose levels significantly decreased in the luseo group regardless of age (Fig. 4i–p). The ratio of insulin/glucose in the control group decreased with age (Fig. 4q). Interestingly, the ratio in the luseo group was significantly higher than the control group for all ages, although the 28-week-old luseo group was significantly lower than the 10-week-old luseo group (Fig. 4q).
Effects of luseogliflozin on beta cell morphology in db/db mice of different ages
We investigated beta cell morphology in db/db mice of different ages. Beta cell mass in the control group decreased with age (Fig. 5a). Unexpectedly, beta cell mass in the luseo group significantly increased compared with the control group regardless of age, although beta cell mass in the 28-week-old luseo group was significantly lower than the 10-week-old luseo group. Similarly, the ratio of BrdU-positive beta cells in the control group decreased with age (Fig. 5b). Although this ratio in the 10-week-old luseo group significantly increased compared with the 10-week-old control group, there were no significant differences between the luseo group and the control group for the other ages (Fig. 5b). These results were consistent with those using Ki67 staining in 10- and 28-week-old db/db mice groups (Fig. 5c).
For apoptosis, while the ratio of TUNEL-positive beta cells in the 10-week-old luseo group decreased compared with the control group, there was no difference between the two groups in 28-week-old db/db mice (Fig. 5d). Additionally, we evaluated Mafa expression in these groups (Fig. 5e) and found that the percentage of Mafa-positive beta cells in the control group decreased with age, but the percentage significantly increased in the luseo group compared with the control group regardless of age. The percentage in the 28-week-old luseo group did show a significant decrease compared with the 10-week-old luseo group (Fig. 5e). These results suggest that Mafa expression could be associated with beta cell function and beta cell mass.
Discussion
We began by investigating the effects of luseogliflozin on beta cell function and beta cell mass in 6-week-old db/db mice, which are characteristically obese and hyperphagic, and develop diabetes at a young age. Treatment with luseogliflozin for 4 weeks improved glucose tolerance and beta cell function, and increased beta cell mass. Those observations were consistent with previous reports13,16,17. In db/db mice, beta cell dysfunction developed after 6 weeks’ old age (Fig. 4q). A possible reason for beta cell dysfunction could be chronic hyperglycemia followed by an increase in oxidative stress. Excessive oxidative stress resulting from chronic hyperglycemia can decrease the expression of beta cell transcription factors, such as Mafa, Pdx118. We suggest that a reduction in renal glucose reabsorption with luseogliflozin could ameliorate glucose tolerance and oxidative stress, preserving beta cell function by increasing the expression of beta cell transcription factors.
Although treatment with luseogliflozin for 4 weeks increased beta cell mass in 6-week-old db/db mice (Fig. 2b), the mechanism is unclear. Studies have suggested that elevated blood glucose levels and increased beta cell proliferation were a compensatory response against insulin resistance in 4-week-old db/db mice15, and that nuclear exclusion of Forkhead box protein O1 (FoxO1), a key downstream mediator of glucose or insulin signaling, was a contributing factor in beta cell proliferation in 4-week-old db/db mice15,19,20. In 6-week-old db/db mice, beta cell proliferation was reduced along with FoxO1 nuclear translocation via hyperglycemia and increase of oxidative stress15. We hypothesized that luseogliflozin maintains FoxO1 in the cytoplasm, promoting beta cell proliferation in 6-week-old db/db mice. However, there was no difference in the FoxO1 nuclear expression in beta cells between the control and luseo groups in the immunofluorescence analysis (see Supplementary Fig. S1a,b). The percentage of Mafa-positive beta cells significantly increased in the luseo group compared with the control group (Fig. 3c). It is reported that mice lacking Mafa in the pancreas show a decreased beta cell mass21. In addition, transgenic mice that conditionally and specifically produce Mafa in db/db islet beta cells augment beta cell mass22. Our findings align with these results, suggesting that increased beta cell mass involves an increase in Mafa nuclear expression with luseogliflozin treatment. With regard to decreased Mafa expression due to excess of oxidative stress, Matsuoka et al.23 reported that c-Jun expression was upregulated in islets of db/db mice exposed to oxidative stress, and this expression pattern paralleled with the loss of Mafa expression. In the current study, the ratio of c-Jun-positive beta cells in the luseo group significantly decreased compared with that in the control group (see Supplementary Fig. S2a,b). This result suggests that luseogliflozin could preserve Mafa expression by suppressing oxidative stress-induced c-Jun expression, resulting in improved beta cell function and preventing decreased beta cell mass. Our finding of the association among oxidative stress, Mafa expression and beta cell mass are consistent with a study on the effects of antioxidant enzymes showing that beta cell-specific overexpression of glutathione peroxidase preserved intranuclear Mafa expression and beta cell mass in db/db mice24.
In addition to decreased beta cell proliferation and increased beta cell apoptosis, recent studies have suggested, as an alternative mechanism, that beta cell dedifferentiation to endocrine progenitor-like cells and conversion to other endocrine cells act to reduce beta cell mass25–27. We used markers of islet progenitor cells, such as neurogenin 3 (Neurog3), aldehyde dehydrogenase 1a3 (Aldh1a3), to determine whether luseogliflozin treatment could prevent beta cell dedifferentiation (see Supplementary Fig. S3a,b). There were no differences in expression levels of Neurog3 mRNA and Aldh1a3 mRNA, or nuclear expression levels between the control and luseo groups in 6-week-old db/db mice after 4 weeks of treatment. This was consistent with a recent study showing that the SGLT inhibitor phloridzin had no effect on the reduction of beta cell dedifferentiation28.
An important finding of the current study is that luseogliflozin treatment for 4 weeks improved beta cell function and increased beta cell mass in db/db mice of different ages, although improvement in 24-week-old db/db mice was to a lesser extent than that in 6-week-old db/db mice. Progressive decline of pancreatic beta cells is an established feature of T2D, and early intervention for patients with T2D is important for the protection of beta cells. Our finding of less improvement in 24-week-old db/db mice supports the “the earlier, the better” approach to treatment.
In the current study, luseogliflozin treatment improved beta cell function and increased beta cell mass in 24-week-old db/db mice, in which insulin secretion were severely impaired. A previous study on db/db mice indicated that liraglutide and/or pioglitazone treatment during the early phase of diabetes (7-week-old db/db mice) preserved beta cell function and mass, but the same treatment in the late phase (16-week-old db/db mice) did not have the same effect29. Similar results using liraglutide monotherapy are reported30. In these experiments, Mafa expression increased during intervention in the early phase of diabetes compared with the late phase29,30. Although the different outcomes observed between these and our own study may be related with the treatment duration or types of drugs, blood glucose decreasing potential could be an important factor contributing to the differences between the studies. In these previous reports, decreases of blood glucose following treatment in the late phase of diabetes were less than those in the early phase29,30. Accordingly, amelioration of glucotoxicity and Mafa expression turned insufficient, resulting in no improvement in beta cell function nor mass. To the contrary, decreases in blood glucose was almost comparable across age levels in the current study, and Mafa expression increased following luseogliflozin treatment in mice in both the early and late phases of diabetes, leading to improved beta cell function and mass even in mice in the late phase of diabetes.
This study had some limitations. First, luseogliflozin was administered for only 4 weeks. It is not shown, if more beneficial effects on beta cell function and mass could be observed in mice in the late phase of diabetes when treatment is continued from 6 to 28 weeks. Second, it remains unknown whether there are differences between the protective effects of the SGLT2 inhibitor and other antidiabetic agents on pancreatic beta cells. Future studies will compare the protective effects of insulin treatment on beta cells with that of the SGLT2 inhibitor in db/db mice, where a reduction in blood glucose with these drugs is achieved at the same level.
In conclusion, treatment with luseogliflozin preserved beta cell function and beta cell mass in db/db mice. This protective effect was observed in the early phase of diabetes and partially in the late phase. Although clinical trials to investigate the effects of luseogliflozin in patients with T2D classified by endogenous insulin secretion are needed, our findings suggest that luseogliflozin has more potential for the treatment of diabetes and related disorders than currently expected in clinical practice.
Materials
Animals
We used 6-, 10-, 14- and 24-week-old male BKS. Cg-Dock7m+/+Lepr db/J (db/db) mice purchased from Oriental Yeast Co. (Tokyo, Japan). Blood glucose levels in 6-week-old db/db mice were substantially higher than those in 6-week-old littermate (db/m) mice and the percentage of Mafa-positive beta cells was significantly lower in 6-week-old db/db mice compared with 6-week-old db/m mice (data not shown). Therefore, 6-week-old db/db mice were considered as the early phase of diabetes in our study. Mice were housed two to three animals per cage for all experiments under controlled ambient conditions on a 12-h light/dark cycle (lights on at 7 a.m.). Mice were divided into two groups; fed either standard chow (CE-2, CLEA JAPAN, Tokyo, Japan) or standard chow containing luseogliflozin 0.01% for 4 weeks. Animals were given free access to drinking water and food, maintained at 25 °C. The study was approved by the Animal Use Committee of Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine and was conducted in compliance with the Animal Use Guidelines of the Hokkaido University.
Compound
The SGLT2 inhibitor luseogliflozin was prepared by Taisho Pharmaceutical (Tokyo, Japan)31. The dosage of luseogliflozin was decided as previously described13.
Measurement of biochemical parameters
Blood glucose levels were measured using a Glutestmint portable glucose meter (Sanwa Chemical Co., Nagoya, Japan). Insulin levels were measured using an insulin ELISA kit (Morinaga Institute of Biological Science, Yokohama, Japan).
Intraperitoneal insulin tolerance test
Insulin tolerance test was performed under non-fasting conditions. Mice were injected with human regular insulin (2 units/kg body weight) intraperitoneally and measured from the tail vein at 0, 30, 60, 90 and 120 min. The total area under the blood glucose concentration curve (AUC) was calculated by trapezoidal method from time 0 to 120 min after intraperitoneal administration of insulin.
Oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)
For the OGTT, mice were fasted for 4 h or 16 h before being orally loaded with glucose (1.0 mg/g body weight). Blood samples were collected from the tail vein at 0, 5, 30, 60 and 120 min after glucose administration for plasma glucose levels. The total AUC was determined from 0 to 120 min.
Immunohistochemistry
Isolated pancreatic tissues were immersion-fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde at 4 °C overnight. Tissues were then roughly paraffin-embedded and 5-μm sections were mounted on glass slides using standard procedures. Sections were immersed for 15 min in methanol containing 0.3% (vol/vol) hydrogen peroxide to deactivate endogenous peroxidase activity. After rinsing with PBS, sections were immunostained with specific antibodies, including rabbit antihuman insulin antibody (diluted 1:500) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA). Sections were counterstained with hematoxylin. Beta cell mass was calculated as: beta cell mass (mg) = beta cell area/pancreatic area × pancreas weight (mg).
For immunofluorescence, tissue sections were incubated overnight at 4 °C with the primary antibodies listed in Supplementary Table 1. After rinsing with PBS, tissues were incubated with the secondary antibodies for 40 min (diluted 1:200) (see Supplementary Table 1). Immunofluorescence images were acquired using a BZ-II analyzer (Keyence, Osaka, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. At least 50 islets per mouse were counted in each group.
Analysis of beta cell proliferation and apoptosis
Beta cell proliferation was identified by staining sections with 5-bromo-2-deoxyuridine (BrdU) antibody, as described previously32. Immunohistochemical detection of BrdU was performed using a commercial kit (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ) and was double immunostained with an anti-insulin antibody (diluted 1:500). Beta cell apoptotic cell death was identified using a fluorometric terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick-end labelling (TUNEL) system (Deadend; Promega, Madison, WI). BrdU-positive and TUNEL-positive beta cells were quantitatively assessed as the percentage of the total number of beta cells and at least 50 islets per mouse were counted in each group.
Islet isolation study
Islets were isolated using collagenase from clostridium histolyticum (Sigma-Aldrich) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. To measure insulin content, isolated islets were extracted in acid ethanol and the insulin concentration of the assay buffer was measured using an insulin ELISA kit (Morinaga Institute of Biological Science).
Real-time quantitative PCR
Total RNA was isolated using a RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and was used as the starting material for cDNA preparation. A real-time PCR study was performed in duplicate using a 7500 Fast Real Time PCR system with SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). The results were quantified using the comparative cycle threshold method, and expression was normalized to glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). The primer sequences used are listed in Supplementary Table 2.
Statistical analysis
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n). The Student’s t-test was used for comparisons between two groups. Individual comparisons between more than two groups were assessed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the post-hoc Fisher’s partial least significant difference test. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Electronic supplementary material
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Ms N. Fujimori and Ms M. Watanabe for their technical support and animal care. We thank Alexander Pishief, LLB, BBmedSc, from Edanz Group (www.edanzediting.com/ac) for editing a draft of this manuscript. This work was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B) 26860683 from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) of Japan and a Grant-in-Aid for Young Researchers from the Japan Association for Diabetes Education and Care (to A.N).
Author Contributions
All authors conceived and designed the study, and participated in the analysis and interpretation of the data. K.T. and A.N. drafted the manuscript and all other authors revised it critically for intellectual content. All authors approved the final version of the paper.
Competing Interests
A.N. received honoraria for lectures from Sanofi, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly Japan, MSD, Novo Nordisk Pharma, Novartis Pharma, AstraZeneca, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Astellas, Kowa Pharmaceutical, Ono, Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Kissei Pharmaceutical, and Taisho Toyama Pharmaceutical; and obtained research support from Sanofi, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, MSD, Novo Nordisk Pharma, Novartis Pharma, AstraZeneca, Ono, and Taisho Toyama Pharmaceutical. H.M. received honoraria for lectures from Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Dainippon Pharma, Eli Lilly, Kissei, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, MSD, Novo Nordisk Pharma, and Sanofi; and has received research funding from Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, and Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma. Y.T. received honoraria for speakers bureau from Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca K.K., Bayer Yakuhin, Daiichi Sankyo, Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma, Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Kowa Pharmaceutical, Merck Sharp & Dohme K.K., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Novo Nordisk Pharma, Ono Pharmaceutical, Sanwa Kagaku Kenkyusho, Sanofi K.K., Shionogi & Co, Taisho Toyama Pharmaceutical, and Takeda Pharmaceutical; and grants from Astellas Pharma, Daiichi Sankyo, Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma, MSD K.K., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Ono Pharmaceutical, Sanofi K.K., and Takeda Pharmaceutical. T.A. received honoraria for lectures from Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Astellas Pharma, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, and AbbVie; and received research funding from Astellas Pharma, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo, and Otsuka Pharmaceutical. The other authors have no potential conflicts of interest to declare.
Footnotes
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-018-25126-z.
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Taylor SI. Deconstructing type 2 diabetes. Cell. 1999;97:9–12. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80709-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Prentki M, Nolan CJ. Islet beta cell failure in type 2 diabetes. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2006;116:1802–1812. doi: 10.1172/JCI29103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Butler AE, et al. Beta-cell deficit and increased beta-cell apoptosis in humans with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2003;52:102–110. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.52.1.102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sakuraba H, et al. Reduced beta-cell mass and expression of oxidative stress-related DNA damage in the islet of Japanese Type II diabetic patients. Diabetologia. 2002;45:85–96. doi: 10.1007/s125-002-8248-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.U.K. prospective diabetes study 16. Overview of 6 years’ therapy of type II diabetes: a progressive disease. U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Diabetes44, 1249-1258 (1995). [PubMed]
- 6.Dalboge LS, et al. Characterisation of age-dependent beta cell dynamics in the male db/db mice. PloS one. 2013;8:e82813. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Puff R, et al. Reduced proliferation and a high apoptotic frequency of pancreatic beta cells contribute to genetically-determined diabetes susceptibility of db/db BKS mice. Hormone and metabolic research. 2011;43:306–311. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1271817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Chen L, Klein T, Leung PS. Effects of combining linagliptin treatment with BI-38335, a novel SGLT2 inhibitor, on pancreatic islet function and inflammation in db/db mice. Current molecular medicine. 2012;12:995–1004. doi: 10.2174/156652412802480970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Thomas L, et al. Long-term treatment with empagliflozin, a novel, potent and selective SGLT-2 inhibitor, improves glycaemic control and features of metabolic syndrome in diabetic rats. Diabetes, obesity & metabolism. 2012;14:94–96. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2011.01518.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Vallon V. The mechanisms and therapeutic potential of SGLT2 inhibitors in diabetes mellitus. Annual review of medicine. 2015;66:255–270. doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-051013-110046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Washburn WN. Development of the renal glucose reabsorption inhibitors: a new mechanism for the pharmacotherapy of diabetes mellitus type 2. Journal of medicinal chemistry. 2009;52:1785–1794. doi: 10.1021/jm8013019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Jurczak MJ, et al. SGLT2 deletion improves glucose homeostasis and preserves pancreatic beta-cell function. Diabetes. 2011;60:890–898. doi: 10.2337/db10-1328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Okauchi S, et al. Protective effects of SGLT2 inhibitor luseogliflozin on pancreatic beta-cells in obese type 2 diabetic db/db mice. Biochemical and biophysical research communications. 2016;470:772–782. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.10.109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Nakamura A, et al. Control of beta cell function and proliferation in mice stimulated by small-molecule glucokinase activator under various conditions. Diabetologia. 2012;55:1745–1754. doi: 10.1007/s00125-012-2521-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Guo S, et al. Inactivation of specific beta cell transcription factors in type 2 diabetes. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2013;123:3305–3316. doi: 10.1172/JCI65390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Cheng ST, Chen L, Li SY, Mayoux E, Leung PS. The Effects of Empagliflozin, an SGLT2 Inhibitor, on Pancreatic beta-Cell Mass and Glucose Homeostasis in Type 1 Diabetes. PloS one. 2016;11:e0147391. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Terami N, et al. Long-term treatment with the sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, dapagliflozin, ameliorates glucose homeostasis and diabetic nephropathy in db/db mice. PloS one. 2014;9:e100777. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Robertson RP. Chronic oxidative stress as a central mechanism for glucose toxicity in pancreatic islet beta cells in diabetes. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2004;279:42351–42354. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R400019200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Okamoto H, et al. Role of the forkhead protein FoxO1 in beta cell compensation to insulin resistance. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2006;116:775–782. doi: 10.1172/JCI24967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Terauchi Y, et al. Glucokinase and IRS-2 are required for compensatory beta cell hyperplasia in response to high-fat diet-induced insulin resistance. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2007;117:246–257. doi: 10.1172/JCI17645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hang Y, et al. The MafA transcription factor becomes essential to islet beta-cells soon after birth. Diabetes. 2014;63:1994–2005. doi: 10.2337/db13-1001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Matsuoka TA, et al. Preserving Mafa expression in diabetic islet beta-cells improves glycemic control in vivo. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2015;290:7647–7657. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.595579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Matsuoka TA, et al. Regulation of MafA expression in pancreatic beta-cells in db/db mice with diabetes. Diabetes. 2010;59:1709–1720. doi: 10.2337/db08-0693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Harmon JS, et al. beta-Cell-specific overexpression of glutathione peroxidase preserves intranuclear MafA and reverses diabetes in db/db mice. Endocrinology. 2009;150:4855–4862. doi: 10.1210/en.2009-0708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Dor Y, Glaser B. beta-cell dedifferentiation and type 2 diabetes. The New England journal of medicine. 2013;368:572–573. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcibr1214034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Talchai C, Xuan S, Lin HV, Sussel L, Accili D. Pancreatic beta cell dedifferentiation as a mechanism of diabetic beta cell failure. Cell. 2012;150:1223–1234. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.07.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wang Z, York NW, Nichols CG, Remedi MS. Pancreatic beta cell dedifferentiation in diabetes and redifferentiation following insulin therapy. Cell metabolism. 2014;19:872–882. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2014.03.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ishida E, Kim-Muller JY, Accili D. Pair Feeding, but Not Insulin, Phloridzin, or Rosiglitazone Treatment, Curtails Markers of beta-Cell Dedifferentiation in db/db Mice. Diabetes. 2017;66:2092–2101. doi: 10.2337/db16-1213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kimura T, et al. Protective effects of pioglitazone and/or liraglutide on pancreatic beta-cells in db/db mice: Comparison of their effects between in an early and advanced stage of diabetes. Molecular and cellular endocrinology. 2015;400:78–89. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2014.11.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Shao Y, Yuan G, Feng Y, Zhang J, Guo X. Early liraglutide treatment is better in glucose control, beta-cell function improvement and mass preservation in db/db mice. Peptides. 2014;52:134–142. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2013.11.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Yamamoto K, et al. TS-071 is a novel, potent and selective renal sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor with anti-hyperglycaemic activity. British journal of pharmacology. 2011;164:181–191. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01340.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Sato K, et al. Impact of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor vildagliptin on glucose tolerance and beta-cell function and mass in insulin receptor substrate-2-knockout mice fed a high-fat diet. Endocrinology. 2012;153:1093–1102. doi: 10.1210/en.2011-1712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.