Table 1.
Relative importance of various factors in bacterial communities within each ecosystem, calculated by Adonis
| Explanatory factor for Adonis analysis | Number in analysis (filters)—samples | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Portion of variation accountable to factor (p value) | ||||
| Ecosystem | Sampling Site | Size | Site × size | |
| Lake water | 0.31 (0.001) | 0.24 (0.001) | 0.08 (0.628) | (32)—16 |
| River water | 0.14 (0.001) | 0.37 (0.001) | 0.08 (0.007) | (36)—18 |
| Groundwater | 0.38 (1.00) | 0.38 (1.00) | 0.24(1.00) | (8)—4 |
| Wastewater | 0.33 (0.001) | 0.33 (0.001) | 0.18 (0.065) | (12)—6 |
| Tap water | 0.51 (1.00) | 0.31 (1.00) | 0.18 (1.00) | (8)—4 |
For each explanatory variable (sampling site, size, and interactions between these two factors), the portion of variation accounted for by each variable and the p value for statistical significance of the variable are expressed. Sampling site refers to the specific location for each sample (i.e., River A vs. River B). For this analysis, only large and small bacteria groups were included for size (“All bacteria” was excluded from analysis). Large bacteria is the HNA-dominated community collected on a 0.4 µm filter, and Small bacteria is the LNA-dominated community in the 0.4 µm filtrate, collected on a 0.2 µm filter