Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 16;12(5):1210–1224. doi: 10.1038/s41396-017-0037-1

Table 1.

Clinical characteristics of the subgingival sampling sites

Subject group Baseline Post-treatment
PPD (mm) CAL (mm) % BOP PPD (mm) CAL (mm) % BOP
Healthya, b 3.1 ± 0.42c 0.5 ± 1.13c 4.8d N/A N/A N/A
Diseased; all sitesa, e 5.7 ± 1.36c 5.4 ± 2.16c 86d N/A N/A N/A
Diseased; pre- and post-treatment sitesf 5.8 ± 1.3g 5.5 ± 1.6 89h 4.9 ± 1.41g 5.1 ± 1.59 21h

PPDperiodontal probing depth, CAL clinical attachment loss, BOP bleeding on probing

aSingle-site samples from two contralateral teeth of each subject

bFrom mesiopalatal site of the first molars (N = 42) of 21 subjects

cp <  0.0001 by Student’s t-test between non-diseased and diseased

dp <  0.0001 by chi-square test between non-diseased and diseased

eFrom palatal sites of maxillary molars (N = 90), buccal sites of maxillary molars (N = 4) and palatal sites of maxillary premolars (N = 2) of 48 subjects

fAmong 48 subjects with periodontitis, 19 subjects were sampled again (from a site sampled before the treatment) at least 4 weeks after nonsurgical periodontal therapy

gp <  0.0005 by paired Student’s t-test before and after treatment

hp <  0.0001 by chi-square test before and after treatment