Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Trop Med Int Health. 2018 Mar 30;23(5):526–532. doi: 10.1111/tmi.13047

Table 3.

Performance of different thresholds of the score of the prediction tool for virologic failure

Score* Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) n PPV (%) NPV (%) AUROC % need VL
test
VF missed
(%)
≥ 1 100.0 3.7 920 9.7 100 0.7694 96.1 0/90
≥ 2 90.0 29.7 687 11.8 96.6 0.7651 71.8 9/90 (10%)
≥ 3 75.6 69.7 329 20.7 96.5 0.7164 34.8 22/90 (24%)
≥ 4 38.9 93.0 95 36.8 93.6 0.6681 9.9 55/90 (61%)
*

Variables included in tool: age <38 years, ART duration >2.5 years, ART adherence <95%, hemoglobin <13 g/dL, and CD4 <200 cells/µL

PPV – positive predictive value; NPV – negative predictive value; AUROC – area under receiver operator curve; VL – viral load