Skip to main content
. 2018 May 2;7:71. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0727-4

Table 3.

Risk of bias of included studies

Study (year) Was the allocation sequence adequately generated? Was allocation adequately concealed? Was the study adequately protected against contamination? Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented? Were incomplete outcome data adequately addressed? Was baseline outcome measurement similar? Was baseline characteristics similar? Was the study free from selective outcome reporting? Overall riska
 1. Basheti (2009) Low Unclear Unclear Unclear Low Low Low Low Unclear
 2. Chalker (2005) Unclear Unclear Low Unclear Low Low Unclear Low Unclear
 3. Chuc (2002) Low Unclear Low Low Low Low Unclear Low Unclear
 4. de Almeida Neto (2000) Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Low Unclear Unclear Low Unclear
 5. de Almeida Neto (2000) Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Low Unclear Unclear Low Unclear
 6. Dolovich (2007) Low Unclear Unclear Low Low Unclear Low Low Unclear
 7. Garcia (1998) Unclear Unclear Low Low Low Unclear Unclear Low Unclear
 8. Garcia (2003) Low Unclear Low Low Low Unclear Unclear Low Unclear
 9. Kimberlin (1993) Unclear Low Unclear Unclear Low Unclear Low Low Unclear
 10. Lalonde (2008) Low Low Low High Low Low High Low High
 11. Mayer (1998) Unclear Unclear Low Low Low Low Unclear Low Unclear
 12. Patwardhan (2012) Low Low Low Unclear Low Low Low Low Unclear
 13. Prokhorov (2010) Unclear Unclear Low Unclear Low Unclear Low Low Unclear
 14. Reeves (2007) Low Unclear Low High Low Unclear Low Low High
 15. Sigrist (2002) Unclear Unclear Unclear Low Low Low Unclear Low High
 16. Sinclair (1998) High Unclear Low Low Low Unclear Low Low Unclear
 17. Watson (2002) Low Unclear Low Unclear Low Low Low Low Unclear

aKey for overall assessment of bias within a study; if low of bias for all key domains (low of bias); if unclear risk of bias for one or more key domains (unclear risk of bias); if high of bias for one or more key domains (high of bias)