Table 2.
CCNV category a | Isolate b | colony phenotype | Source c |
---|---|---|---|
1× CCNV | Pr-140.9 (wt, QUPS) | wt | CA 2016 |
1× CCNV HK | WSU111–0001 (wt, stream) | wt | WA 2017 |
1× CCNV complex HK | Pr-140.7 (nwt, QUPS) | nwt | CA 2016 |
1× CCNV HK | Pr-1556#7#1 (nwt, bay→QUCH→race tube) | nwt | CA 2016 |
1× CCNV HK | WSU115–0118 (nwt, Rhododendron) | nwt | WA 2017 |
3× CCNV + 1× CCNV Complex HK | BS2014–584 (nwt, tanoak canker) | nwt | CA 2017 |
2× cnLOH | MK516a (nwt, QUAG) | nwt | CA 2016 |
2× cnLOH | WSU107–0019 (nwt, Rhododendron) | nwt | WA 2017 |
2× cnLOH | Pr-455 (nwt, Osmorhiza) | nwt | CA 2017 |
2× cnLOH complex HK | WSU107–0072 (nwt, Rhododendron) | nwt | WA 2017 |
3× CCNV | Pr-745#3 (nwt, bay→QUCH) | nwt | CA 2016 |
3× CCNV | Pr-218 (wt, Rhamnus) | wt | CA 2017 |
3× CCNV | Pr-102 (nwt, QUAG) | nwt | CA 2016 |
3× CCNV + 1× CCNV HK | Pr-745#4 (nwt, bay→QUCH) | nwt | CA 2016 |
3× CCNV + 2× cnLOH | Pr-16 (nwt, QUAG) | nwt | CA 2016 |
3× CCNV HK | BS96 (nwt, bay) | nwt | CA 2017 |
3× CCNV HK | Pr-472 (Corylus) | nwt | CA 2017 |
3× CCNV HK | Pr-486 (Camellia) | nwt | CA 2017 |
3× CCNV HK | 9D1 (wt, bay→QUAG log) | wt | CA 2017 |
sCNV euploid | WSU108–0021 (wt, Viburnum) | wt | WA 2017 |
sCNV euploid | WSU107–0057 (wt, Rhododendron) | wt | WA 2017 |
a Due to CNV and allele ratio analyses, chromosomal aberrations were categorized into five groups: 1× CCNV, monosomy; 3× CCNV, trisomy; cnLOH, copy-number neutral loss of heterozygosity, and short CNV (sCNV) euploid. HK indicates heterokaryotic isolate
b In the parentheses, colony phenotypes and host plants are indicated. Arrows such as bay→QUCH indicates the isolate was originally from California bay, inoculated and recovered from canyon live oak (see Kasuga et al., [12])
Species names are: bay (California bay, Umbellularia californica); QUAG (coast live oak, Q. agrifolia); QUEN (Engelmann oak, Q. engelmannii); QUWI (interior live oak, Q. wislizeni); QUCH (canyon live oak, Q. chrysolepis); QUPS (Shreve oak, Q. parvula var. shrevei)
c CA 2016 indicates California isolates, published in Kasuga et al., [12]. CA 2017 and WA 2017 indicate California and Washington State isolates, respectively, determined in this study