Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 9;177(1):132–150. doi: 10.1104/pp.18.00062

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Transcriptomic analysis of leaf metabolism in DP and IDL. A, Differential expression analysis was carried out between DP and IDL samples at D3 and D6. The resulting genes that were defined as significant (adjusted P < 0.001; differential expression was carried out using limma) can be observed at top left. These genes were then cross referenced with MapMan annotations and sorted for metabolic functions. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) that correlated to either DP or IDL conditions were recorded and graphed, with light green corresponding to correlation with IDL conditions and dark green corresponding to correlation with DP conditions. B, Histograms of the transcript abundance of representative genes to illustrate the different patterns of abundance present and differences of magnitude. Double asterisks indicate significant (P < 0.01; Student’s t test; three replicates) differences in transcript abundance between the IDL and DP samples. Error bars indicate se.