Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 18;10(3):235–255. doi: 10.1177/1753465816630208

Table 3.

Relevant case–control studies that reported on the risk of pneumonia in patients treated with ICS for COPD.

Study n Country Period ICS Pneumonia OR/HR (95% CI) Mortality OR/HR (95% CI)Þ Dose–effect relationship Industry funding
Increased risk of pneumonia with ICS
Ernst et al. [2007] 175,906 Canada Jan 1988
Dec 2001
No distinction 1.70 (1.63–1.77) 1.53 (1.30–1.80) Yes No
Joo et al. [2009] 145,586 US Oct 1999
Sep 2002
No distinction 1.38 (1.31–1.45) 0.77 (0.75–0.80) No No
Thornton Snider et al. [2012] 83,455 US Jan 2009
Sep 2011
No distinction 1.26 (1.16–1.36) NR Yes Novartis
Yawn et al. [2013] 135,445 US Jan 2006
Sep 2010
No distinction 1.51 (1.42–1.61) NR Yes Novartis
Janson et al. [2013]
(PATHOS)
5468 Sweden Jan 1999
Dec 2009
FP versus BUD 1.74 (1.56–1.94) 1.76 (1.22–2.53) No AstraZeneca ƒ
Suissa [2013] 163,514 Canada Jan 1990
Dec 2005
FP
BUD
Total
2.01 (1.93–2.10)
1.17 (1.09–1.26)
1.69 (1.63–1.75)
NR Yes No
DiSantostefano et al. [2014] 18,047 UK Jan 2002
Dec 2010
No distinction 1.49 (1.22–1.83) NR Yes GlaxoSmithKline Ŧ
Kern et al. [2015] 7394 US NR BUD versus FP 0.92 (0.81–1.04) NR NR AstraZeneca ƒ
No increased risk of pneumonia with ICS
Mapel et al. [2010] 5245 US Sep 2001
Aug 2003
ICS alone
ICS/LABA
1.29 (0.96–1.73)
1.03 (0.74–1.42)
NR NA GlaxoSmithKline
Festic et al. [2014] 589¥ US Mar 2009
Aug 2009
No distinction 1.40 (0.95–2.09) NR NA No
Gershon et al. [2014] 11,872 Canada Sep 2003
Mar 2011
ICS/LABA versus
LABA alone
1.01 (0.93–1.08) 0.92 (0.87–0.97) NA No

RCT, randomized controlled trial; ICS, inhaled corticosteroids; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; LABA, long acting β2-agonist; FP, fluticasone propionate; BUD, budesonide; OR, odds ratio; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; NR, not reported; NA, not applicable.

Hospitalization for, or death from, pneumonia, unless otherwise specified.

Þ

Pneumonia-related mortality unless otherwise specified.

ƒ

This study was funded by AstraZeneca, which also took part in the data collection and analysis, the interpretation of the data, and the drafting of the manuscript.

Ŧ

This study was funded by GlaxoSmithKline, but did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis or preparation of the manuscript.

¥

Subset of patients with COPD.