Skip to main content
. 2018 May 3;13(5):e0196814. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196814

Table 1. Number of observations and power for analysis for the critical value of 0.2 of Pearson correlation.

Healthy eyes Glaucomatous eyes
Subjects (eyes) Power Subjects (eyes) Power
DIGS/ADAGES
RA vs SAP MS and MD 694 (1212) 1.00 271 (362) 0.91
RA vs SWAP MS and MD 472 (802) 0.99 247 (328) 0.89
RA vs FDP MS 685 (1207) 1.00 266 (356) 0.91
RNFLT vs SAP MS and MD 204 (336) 0.82 180 (238) 0.77
RNFLT vs FDP MS 181 (295) 0.77 151 (200) 0.70
IOWA
RNFLT vs SAP MD 76 (76) 0.41
SUNY-IU
RNFLT vs SAP, CSP, FDP MS 62 (62) 0.35 51 (51) 0.29