Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 23;14(4):e1006097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006097

Table 4. Comparison of the number of annotations found by each method for each superfamily at the highest recall point.

Column A indicates the number of annotations found exclusively by TE-LearnerLTR, column I is the number of annotations that were predicted by both methods and column B indicates the number of annotations found exclusively by the compared method.

D. melanogaster A. thaliana
Superfamily A I B A I B
TE-LearnerLTR vs. RepeatMasker
Copia 6 165 11 49 596 351
Gypsy 82 1625 1072 114 1053 1404
Bel-Pao 5 344 183
TE-LearnerLTR vs. Censor
Copia 2 169 11 50 595 366
Gypsy 81 1626 1065 104 1063 1399
Bel-Pao 11 338 172
TE-LearnerLTR vs. LtrDigest
Copia 128 43 1 507 138 18
Gypsy 1293 414 46 1134 33 9
Bel-Pao 218 131 5