Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 19;31(6):842–850. doi: 10.5713/ajas.17.0760

Table 4.

Correlations between capacitation status before and after capacitation, differences (Δ) in capacitation status before and after capacitation, and litter size1)

Item Species Cut-off value (%) Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) Negative predictive value (%) Positive predictive value (%) Overall accuracy (%)
AR pattern after capacitation Landrace 10.76 81.82 66.67 75.00 75.00 75.00
Yorkshire 10.03 85.71 50.00 60.00 80.00 75.00
Duroc 5.89 78.57 50.00 50.00 75.57 70.00
Differences (Δ) in AR pattern before and after capacitation Landrace 9.58 81.82 77.78 77.78 81.82 80.00
Yorkshire 9.46 64.29 66.67 44.44 81.82 65.00
Duroc 6.29 50.00 66.67 36.36 77.78 55.00
Differences (Δ) in B pattern before and after capacitation Landrace 39.70 100.00 44.44 100.00 68.75 75.00
1)

Sensitivity: the percentage of boars that were correctly identified by the test based on litter size. Specificity: the percentage of boars that tested as truly negative. The positive predictive value: the percentage of boars that tested positive but actually had a litter size ≥11 or <11 (Landrace), litter size ≥12 or <12 (Yorkshire), or litter size ≥8 or <8 (Duroc). The negative predictive value: the percentage of boars that tested negative but actually had a litter size ≥11 or <11 (Landrace), litter size ≥12 or <12 (Yorkshire), or litter size ≥8 or <8 (Duroc).