TABLE 3. Comparison of Opportunity Versus No Opportunity (N = 87)^a and Eligible Versus Ineligible (N = 73)^b Patients by Sociodemographic and Disease Characteristics.

	Opportunity (n = 18)		No Opportunity (n = 69)			Eligible (n = 12)		Ineligible (n = 61)
Characteristic	$\stackrel{‒}{\mathrm{X}}$	SD	$\stackrel{‒}{\mathrm{X}}$	SD	pc	$\stackrel{‒}{\mathrm{X}}$	SD	$\stackrel{‒}{\mathrm{X}}$	SD	pc
Age (years)	59.6	8.9	55.2	12.5	0.17	55.4	9.5	55.3	11.5	0.98

Characteristic	n	n	pc	n	n	pc
Race or ethnicity			0.43			0.53
Black or Hispanic	11	33		4	29
Non-Hispanic White	7	36		8	32
Sex			0.69			0.08
Female	15	61		8	54
Male	3	8		4	7
Insuranced			0.05			1
Private	8	50		8	42
Medicare	7	15		3	14
Medicaid	2	3		1	4
Education			0.09			0.26
High school or less	13	32		9	29
Associate or bachelor’s	3	20		2	17
Graduate or professional	1	17		1	15
Annual household income ($)			0.28			0.66
Less than 25,000	2	11		2	8
25,000–49,999	6	12		4	12
50,000–99,999	2	15		1	13
100,000 or greater	2	19		3	17
Language			1			0.42
English	16	66		11	59
Bilingual	1	3		1	2
Cancer type			0.08			0.13
Breast	8	49		5	41
Lung	4	11		4	9
Leukemia	5	6		3	7
Other	1	3		–	4
Cancer stagee			0.001			0.00
0–II	1	35		–	36
III–IV	8	10		9	10
Recurrent or relapsed	1	8		–	9
Other	2	7		3	6
Performance statuse			0.41			1
ECOG 0	9	21		7	23
ECOG 1	–	5		1	4
ECOG 2	1	2		–	3

^aOne participant unsure about opportunity status removed from sample.

^bFifteen participants declined electronic medical record review.

^cAll p values are two-sided Fisher’s exact tests performed on non-missing observations.

^dOne participant with no insurance was removed from this analysis.

^eThis information was only collected if available for participants that consented to electronic medical record review (n = 73).

ECOG—Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

Note. Unless otherwise indicated, missing observations reflect participant non-response or that information was not present in the electronic medical record.