Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 May 4.
Published in final edited form as: J Biomed Inform. 2017 Apr 12;70:35–51. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2017.04.009

Table 7b.

Comparison by annotation types among different meta-classifiers trained by mixing virtual annotations.

Settings Type TP (39) Type FP (15) Type TN (29) Type FN (0)
Level 1 (L1) 1029/1170 (0.88) 102/450 (0.23) 110/870 (0.13) n/a
Level 2 (L2) 812/1170 (0.69) 158/450 (0.35) 298/870 (0.34) n/a
L1 + ICD9 1158/1170 (0.99) 10/450 (0.02) 761/870 (0.87) n/a
L2 + ICD9 910/1170 (0.78) 104/450 (0.23) 732/870 (0.84) n/a
Big Logistic 768/1170 (0.66) 276/450 (0.61) 590/870 (0.68) n/a
Big SVM 784/1170 (0.67) 291/450 (0.65) 571/870 (0.66) n/a