Table 2.
Fundamental scheme of the hybrid financial management model utilized by D2d for a typical site that projected to enroll (i.e., randomize) 125 participants
| Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Year 4 | Year 5 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Personnel (effort and fringe benefits) | 178,135 | 183,100 | 183,100 | 137,171 | 137,171 | |
| Non-personnel | 44,534 | 65,586 | 60,208 | 22,043 | 12,297 | |
| Total proposed budget | 222,669 | 248,686 | 243,308 | 159,214 | 149,468 | 1,023,345 |
| Core | ||||||
| Proposed Corea | 89,068 | 91,550 | 91,550 | 68,586 | 68,586 | 409,339 |
| Actual Coreb | 89,068 | 99,474 | 99,474 | 99,474 | 21,848 | 409,339 |
| Performance-Based Payments | ||||||
| PBP amount per enrolled participant: 4912 | 614,007 | |||||
Amounts shown in US$; numbers include directs and 53% indirect rate. The scheme is flexible both from year to year and from site to site, while maintaining consistency
aProposed Core was defined at the start of the study as 50% of annual personnel costs
bActual Core varied from year to year (see text) while the total amount over 5 years did not exceed the total proposed Core (i.e., US$409,339)