Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 28;1:12. doi: 10.1186/s41687-017-0019-0

Table 4.

Responsiveness of PROMIS instruments and qDASH of patients from baseline

Follow-up Period Instrument n SRM [95% CI] ES [95% CI] p-value Paired t-test
3-month follow-up
PROMIS PF 31 1.05 [0.51, 1.57] 0.84 [0.31, 1.35] < 0.001
PROMIS PI 31 1.63 [1.04, 2.18] 1.48 [0.90, 2.02] < 0.001
PROMIS UE 28 1.26 [0.67, 1.81] 1.05 [0.48, 1.59] 0.006
qDASH 29 1.44 [0.84, 2.00] 1.12 [0.28, 1.66] < 0.001
>3-month follow-up
PROMIS PF 150 1.16 [0.91, 1.40] 0.92 [0.68, 1.16] < 0.001
PROMIS PI 176 1.09 [0.86, 1.31] 0.99 [0.77, 1.21] < 0.001
PROMIS UE 148 1.24 [0.99, 1.49] 0.88 [0.64, 1.12] 0.001
qDASH 149 1.26 [1.01, 1.51] 0.97 [0.73, 1.21] < 0.001
6-month follow-up
PROMIS PF 18 1.26 [0.52, 1.94] 0.83 [0.13, 1.49] < 0.001
PROMIS PI 20 1.16 [0.47, 1.80] 0.79 [0.13, 1.42] < 0.001
PROMIS UE 18 1.42 [0.66, 2.12] 0.85 [0.15, 1.51] 0.001
qDASH 18 1.36 [0.61, 2.05] 0.80 [0.10, 1.46] < 0.001
>6-month follow-up
PROMIS PF 52 1.25 [0.82, 1.66] 0.87 [0.46, 1.27] 0.033
PROMIS PI 61 1.15 [0.76, 1.53] 0.96 [0.58, 1.33] < 0.001
PROMIS UE 52 1.43 [0.99, 1.85] 0.85 [0.44, 1.24] 0.253
qDASH 55 1.26 [0.84, 1.66] 0.93 [0.53, 1.32] 0.006