Table 1.
Regulatory Skin Sensitization Endpoints and Test Methods Accepted for Regulatory Use as of 2017
Region/country | Chemical Sector | Endpointa | Accepted In Vivo Methodsb | Non-animal Alternative Accepted? |
---|---|---|---|---|
Brazil | Cosmetics and Personal Care Products | Hazard | Clinical studiesc LLNAc and its modifications Buehler GPMT |
Yes, as part of an integrated strategy |
Pesticides and Plant Protection Products | Hazard | LLNAc and its modifications Buehler GPMT |
Yes, as part of an integrated strategy | |
Pharmaceuticals | Hazard | Clinical studiesc LLNAc and its modifications Buehler GPMT |
Yes, as part of an integrated strategy | |
Canada | Cosmetics | Riskd | Data submitted upon request only. Results from open literature are acceptable (e.g., LLNA, GPMT, Buehler) | Yes |
Household Products and Art Materials | Riskd | LLNA (preferred if risk assessment is needed) GPMT Buehler | Yes, if animal data are unavailable | |
Industrial Chemicals (on Domestic Substances List) | Potency, risk | Data submission not required; Health Canada uses data from accepted methods (LLNA, GPMT, Buehler) | Yes (in voluntary submission) | |
Chemicals Not Listed on Domestic Substances List | Potency, risk | LLNAc GPMT Buehler LLNA methods that do not require radiolabeled probes |
Considered on a case-by-case basis | |
Medical Devices | Hazard | GPMT LLNA |
Yes, if validated | |
Pesticides | Hazarde | LLNAc GPMT Buehler |
Yes, as part of an integrated strategy | |
Prescription Pharmaceuticals | Hazard, risk | Not specified | Yes, with justification | |
Topical Nonprescription Pharmaceuticals | Hazard | LLNAc GPMT Buehler Clinical studies (e.g., human repeat insult patch test) are preferred for antiseptic drugs |
Yes, with justification | |
Workplace Chemicals | Hazard, potency | New testing not required; data used must be from humans or accepted animal method (e.g., LLNA, GPMT, Buehler) | Nof | |
China | Cosmetics | Potency | Buehlerc GPMTc Clinical studies LLNA (optional) |
No |
Industrial Chemicals | Hazard, potency, risk | Buehlerc GPMTc LLNA (optional) |
No | |
Pesticides | Potency | Buehler | No | |
Workplace Chemicals | Not specified | Buehler GPMT LLNA |
No | |
European Union | Biocides | Hazard | LLNAc (only required if available data are insufficient) Buehler GPMT |
Yes |
Cosmetics | Hazard, potency, risk | Banned (only existing animal data or data generated for other regulatory purposes are accepted) | Yes | |
Household Chemicalsg | Hazard, potency, risk | LLNAc Buehler GPMT |
Yes; OECD TGs 442C, D, and E are preferred before in vivo testingh | |
Industrial Chemicals | Hazard, potency, risk | LLNAc Buehler GPMT |
Yes; OECD TGs 442C, D, and Eare preferred before in vivo testingh | |
Pharmaceuticals | Hazard | Not specified (method should be justified) | Yes | |
Plant Protection Products (i.e. Pesticides) | Hazard | LLNAc, including the
reduced LLNA Buehler GPMT |
No | |
Workplace Chemicalsg | Hazard, potency, risk | LLNAc Buehler GPMT |
Yes; OECD TGs 442C, D, and E are preferred before in vivo testingh | |
Japan | Cosmetics and Personal Care Products | Hazard, potency | GPMT Buehler LLNA |
Yes; OECD TG 442C, D and Eh in an integrated strategy (as of January 2018) |
Household Products | Not required | Selected on a case-by-case basis | Undetermined | |
Industrial Chemicals | Not required | Selected on a case-by-case basis | Undetermined | |
Medical Devices | Hazard, potency, risk | GPMT Buehler LLNA |
No | |
Pesticides | Hazard | GPMT c Buehler c LLNA |
Undetermined | |
Pharmaceuticals | Not specified | Not specified | No | |
Workplace Chemicals | Not required | Selected on a case-by-case basis | Undetermined | |
South Korea | Cosmetics | Hazard, risk | Banned (unless justified) | Yes; OECD TG 442C, D, and Eh |
Industrial Chemicals | Hazard, risk | GPMT Buehler Other justified methods |
Yes; OECD TG 442C and Dh | |
Pesticides | Hazard | LLNA GPMT Buehler Other justified methods |
Considered on a case-by-case basis | |
Pharmaceuticals | Hazard, potency | GPMTc Adjuvant and Patch test Buehler Draize Freund’s Complete Adjuvant test Open Epicutaneous test Optimization test Split Adjuvant test |
No | |
Workplace Chemicals | Hazard, risk | Selected on a case-by-case basis | Undetermined | |
United States | Cosmetics | Not required | Not applicable | Not applicable |
Household Products and Art Materials | Hazard, potency | LLNA and its
modifications GPMT Buehler |
Considered on a case-by-case basis | |
Industrial Chemicals | Hazard, risk | Testing not required | Considered on a case-by-case basis | |
Medical Devices | Hazard | GPMTc Buehler test (topical devices only) LLNA (case-by-case) |
No | |
Pesticides | Hazarde | LLNAc Reduced LLNA GPMT Buehler |
Waivers only | |
Pharmaceuticals | Potencyi | Not specified | As a screen on a case-by-case basis | |
Workplace Chemicals | Hazard, potency | LLNA GPMT Buehler |
Yes, if scientifically validated |
Refers to hazard assessment, potency categorization, or risk assessment
OECD test guidelines (or equivalent)
Preferred assays
Skin sensitization data are typically not required, but risk assessment may be performed for ingredients of concern
While not a regulatory requirement, a quantitative risk assessment may be conducted on a case-by-case basis
The Hazardous Products Regulation may be revised in the future to allow for the consideration of non-animal data
These sectors are covered by REACH, the industrial chemical legislation in Europe
OECD Test Guidelines 442C, D, and E include the DPRA, ARE-Nrf2 Luciferase Test Method, and Human Cell Line Activation Test, respectively
FDA prefers potency information from human tests