Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 18;8(2):109–119. doi: 10.15171/hpp.2018.14

Table 2. Comparison of mean change scores for the Feeling Scale during each visit (n = 20) .

Visit Mean Score Mean Change Score
Pre Mid Post Pre-to-Mid Mid-to-Post Pre-to-Post P value Pre-to-Post % Change
1 3.20 3.55 3.55 0.35* 0 0.35* 10.94
2 3.10 3.35 3.40 0.25 0.05 0.30* 9.68
3 2.85 3.40 3.65 0.55* 0.25 0.80* 28.07
4 3.10 3.65 3.95 0.55* 0.30 0.85* 27.42
5 3.00 3.80 3.75 0.80* 0.05 0.75* 25.00
6 2.75 3.40 3.35 0.75* 0.05 0.60* 21.82
7 2.65 3.65 3.75 1.00* 0.10 1.10* 41.51
8 2.40 3.25 3.35 0.85* 0.10 0.95* 39.58

One-way repeated measures ANOVA for mean change scores between each visit pre-to-mid Feeling Scale was statistically significant along a linear trend (P = 0.002). That is, the trend from 0.35 (visit 1) to 0.85 (visit 8) was statistically significant (P = 0.002).

One-way repeated measures ANOVA for mean change scores between each visit pre-to-post Feeling Scale was statistically significant along a linear trend (P = 0.008). That is, the trend from -0.35 (visit 1) to 0.95 (visit 8) was statistically significant (P = 0.002).

* Statistical significance (P < 0.05) when comparing the pre-vs.-post score for each visit in isolation.