Table 2. Comparison of mean change scores for the Feeling Scale during each visit (n = 20) .
Visit | Mean Score | Mean Change Score | |||||
Pre | Mid | Post | Pre-to-Mid | Mid-to-Post | Pre-to-Post P value | Pre-to-Post % Change | |
1 | 3.20 | 3.55 | 3.55 | 0.35* | 0 | 0.35* | 10.94 |
2 | 3.10 | 3.35 | 3.40 | 0.25 | 0.05 | 0.30* | 9.68 |
3 | 2.85 | 3.40 | 3.65 | 0.55* | 0.25 | 0.80* | 28.07 |
4 | 3.10 | 3.65 | 3.95 | 0.55* | 0.30 | 0.85* | 27.42 |
5 | 3.00 | 3.80 | 3.75 | 0.80* | 0.05 | 0.75* | 25.00 |
6 | 2.75 | 3.40 | 3.35 | 0.75* | 0.05 | 0.60* | 21.82 |
7 | 2.65 | 3.65 | 3.75 | 1.00* | 0.10 | 1.10* | 41.51 |
8 | 2.40 | 3.25 | 3.35 | 0.85* | 0.10 | 0.95* | 39.58 |
One-way repeated measures ANOVA for mean change scores between each visit pre-to-mid Feeling Scale was statistically significant along a linear trend (P = 0.002). That is, the trend from 0.35 (visit 1) to 0.85 (visit 8) was statistically significant (P = 0.002).
One-way repeated measures ANOVA for mean change scores between each visit pre-to-post Feeling Scale was statistically significant along a linear trend (P = 0.008). That is, the trend from -0.35 (visit 1) to 0.95 (visit 8) was statistically significant (P = 0.002).
* Statistical significance (P < 0.05) when comparing the pre-vs.-post score for each visit in isolation.