Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 17;2:6–11. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2015.12.001

Table 4.

Univariate and multivariate analyses of associations between “Perceived understanding”a and demographic factors.


Univariate analysis
Multivariate analysisc
Factor N [%] Mean (SD) Mean difference (95% confidence interval) P Mean difference (95% confidence interval) P
Age
<45 18 [18] 85 (12.5) Reference Reference
45–64 67 [67] 86 (12.4) 1 (−5 to 8) 0.58 0 (−7 to 7) 0.73
≥65 15 [15] 83 (12.4) −2 (−11 to 6) 0.60b −3 (−12 to 6) 0.51b
Gender
Male 16 [16] 85 (10.4) Reference Reference
Female 84 [84] 86 (12.7) 1 (−6 to 7) 0.91 −1 (−9 to 6) 0.74
Education
Elementary school 18 [18] 87 (12.1) Reference Reference
High school 19 [19] 90 (8.7) 3 (−5 to 11) 0.20 3 (−5 to 12) 0.23
University 62 [62] 84 (13.0) −3 (−9 to 4) 0.36b −2 (−9 to 5) 0.51b
Missing 1 [1]
Living alone or not
Cohabitant 70 [70] 84 (12.2) Reference Reference
Alone 29 [29] 89 (11.6) 5 (0–10) 0.062 5 (−1 to 10) 0.084
Missing 1 [1]
Randomized study or not
Not randomized 21 [21] 89 (11.0) Reference Reference
Randomized 79 [79] 85 (12.6) −4 (−10 to 2) 0.24 −3 (−9 to 3) 0.32
Total number of patients in the study with information on knowledge 100 86 (12.4)

Linear regression was used to estimate mean differences and confidence intervals. All reported p-values are two-sided and based on the Wald test.

a

Part B. Total number of questions included 13 (out of 14). Answer to questions are coded 1,2,3,4,5 and are assigned scores of 0, 25, 50, 75 and 100.

b

Test for linear trend.

c

Adjusted for all other listed factors.