Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2018 Aug;46(6):1217–1228. doi: 10.1007/s10802-017-0361-y

Table 4.

Fit statistics for cross-sectional and longitudinal multivariate models of CU, ADHD and ODD Behaviors

Age 2 Overall Fit of Modela
Relative Fit of Model
−2LL df χ2 df p AIC Δχ2 df p
Overall Model
(Saturated −2LL=1176.734, 1813)
 Independent Pathway model 1184.466 1837 7.732 24 1.00 −40.268
Common Pathway Model 1185.096 1841 8.362 28 1.00 −47.638 .63b 4 .96

Age 3 Overall Fit of Modela Relative Fit of Model


−2LL df χ2 df p AIC Δχ2 df p

Overall Model
(Saturated −2LL=1117.925, 1720)
 Independent Pathway model 1152.588 1744 34.663 24 .074 −13.337
Common Pathway Model 1159.166 1748 41.241 28 .051 −14.759 6.578b 4 .16

Longitudinal Overall Fit of Modela Relative Fit of Model


−2LL df χ2 df p AIC Δχ2 df p

Overall Model
(Saturated −2LL=1871.364, 3461)
 Bivariate Common Pathway Model 2105.077 3580 233.713 119 .000 −4.287
Reduced Bivariate Common Pathway Model 2108.295 3590 236.931 129 .000 −21.069 3.218c 10 .98

Note. -2LL=Likelihood Statistic. χ2=Chi-square fit statistic. df=Degrees of freedom. AIC=Akaike’s Information Criterion. Best fitting model indicated in bold.

a

Overall fit of the model is determined by the difference in -2LL of the model and that of a saturated model.

b

χ2 difference between the Independent Pathway model and Common Pathway model.

c

χ2 difference between the full and reduced longitudinal models.