Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 11;5(4):171500. doi: 10.1098/rsos.171500

Table 3.

Comparison of performance between the proposed method with other reported CPE methods for the determination of triazine species. n.a., not available.

samples surfactant determination linearity (μg l−1) LOD (μg l−1) LOQ (μg l−1) recovery (%) ref.
water and soil Triton X-114 HPLC-UV 16–10 000

  1. water: 3.5

  2. soil: 4.0

  1. water: 11.0

  2. soil: 13.0

  1. water: 93–99

  2. soil: 86–94

 [43]
river water Triton X-114 HPLC-DAD 1–50 0.1–0.3 0.4–0.9 86–132 [8]
milk Triton X-114 HPLC-UV 50–2000 6.8–11.2 22.6–37.3 71–97 [1]
water, soil and vegetables PEG-6000 HPLC-UV 1–10 000

  1. water: 0.04–5.8

  2. soil: 0.1–1.4

  3. vegetables: 0.1–1.5

 n.a.

  1. water: 85–91

  2. soil: 84–93

  3. vegetables: 84–92

 [44]
food Triton X-100 and CTAB UV–Vis 50–500 11.2–13.3 37.2–44.3 97–104 [45]
milk OFX 0309 UV–Vis 5–2000 1.1–1.2 3.5–4.1 81–108 this method