Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 May 7.
Published in final edited form as: Connectomics Neuroimaging (2017). 2017 Sep 2;10511:161–170. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-67159-8_19

Table 1.

Simulation results given in terms of p-values. In the case of no network differences (0 vs. 0 and 4 vs. 4), higher p-values are better. In the case of network differences (4 vs. 5 and 5 vs. 10), smaller p-values are better.

L1 L2 L GH KS (β0) KS (γ)

0 vs. 0 0.93 ± 0.04 0.93 ± 0.04 0.93 ± 0.04 0.87 ± 0.14 1.00 ± 0.00 1.00 ± 0.00
4 vs. 4 0.89 ± 0.02 0.89 ± 0.02 0.90 ± 0.03 0.86 ± 0.17 0.87 ± 0.29 0.88 ± 0.28
4 vs. 5 0.14 ± 0.16 0.06 ± 0.10 0.03 ± 0.06 0.29 ± 0.30 (0.07 ± 0.67)** (0.07 ± 0.67)**
5 vs. 10 0.47 ± 0.25 0.19 ± 0.18 0.10 ± 0.10 0.33 ± 0.30 0.01 ± 0.08 (0.06 ± 0.53)*
*

and ** indicates multiplying 10−3 and 10−4.