Table 3. Mito–mito epistasis (VAA) estimates.
Media: | SOE | YPD | YPEG | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Temperature (°C) | 30 | 37 | 30 | 37 | 30 | 37 | |
All crosses | VAA | 0.0051 | 0.0360 | 0.0011 | 0.0028 | 0.0019 | 0.0042 |
C.I. lower | 0.0046 | 0.0354 | 0.0009 | 0.0026 | 0.0017 | 0.0041 | |
C.I. upper | 0.0078 | 0.0400 | 0.0014 | 0.0032 | 0.0022 | 0.0044 | |
Single representation | VAA | 0.0112 | 0.0351 | 0.0010 | 0.0030 | 0.0010 | 0.0037 |
C.I. lower | 0.0109 | 0.0345 | 0.0008 | 0.0027 | 0.0008 | 0.0036 | |
C.I. upper | 0.0141 | 0.0394 | 0.0014 | 0.0033 | 0.00144 | 0.0039 | |
Double representation | VAA | 0.0060 | 0.0413 | 0.0034 | −0.0030 | 0.0030 | 0.0037 |
C.I. lower | 0.0045 | 0.0395 | 0.0033 | −0.0033 | 0.0029 | 0.0035 | |
C.I. upper | 0.0091 | 0.0473 | 0.0037 | −0.0027 | 0.0033 | 0.0038 |
Positive (nonzero) VAA estimates indicate mito–mito epistasis. The overall magnitudes of the VAA values do not provide information regarding their relative contribution to genetic variance. All estimates were significantly different from zero based on permutation analysis (see Materials and Methods). Positive estimates were confirmed based on upper and lower confidence intervals (C.I.s) that did not overlap zero estimated from bootstrapping analysis. Subsets of the data were analyzed for single representation (YJM975 × Y12 and YPS606 × Y55 crosses) or double representation (each mitotype represented twice, YJM975 × Y12 excluded). SOE, ; YPEG, ; YPEGM, .