Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 12;209(1):307–319. doi: 10.1534/genetics.117.300660

Table 3. Mito–mito epistasis (VAA) estimates.

Media: SOE YPD YPEG
Temperature (°C) 30 37 30 37 30 37
All crosses VAA 0.0051 0.0360 0.0011 0.0028 0.0019 0.0042
C.I. lower 0.0046 0.0354 0.0009 0.0026 0.0017 0.0041
C.I. upper 0.0078 0.0400 0.0014 0.0032 0.0022 0.0044
Single representation VAA 0.0112 0.0351 0.0010 0.0030 0.0010 0.0037
C.I. lower 0.0109 0.0345 0.0008 0.0027 0.0008 0.0036
C.I. upper 0.0141 0.0394 0.0014 0.0033 0.00144 0.0039
Double representation VAA 0.0060 0.0413 0.0034 −0.0030 0.0030 0.0037
C.I. lower 0.0045 0.0395 0.0033 −0.0033 0.0029 0.0035
C.I. upper 0.0091 0.0473 0.0037 −0.0027 0.0033 0.0038

Positive (nonzero) VAA estimates indicate mito–mito epistasis. The overall magnitudes of the VAA values do not provide information regarding their relative contribution to genetic variance. All estimates were significantly different from zero based on permutation analysis (see Materials and Methods). Positive estimates were confirmed based on upper and lower confidence intervals (C.I.s) that did not overlap zero estimated from bootstrapping analysis. Subsets of the data were analyzed for single representation (YJM975 × Y12 and YPS606 × Y55 crosses) or double representation (each mitotype represented twice, YJM975 × Y12 excluded). SOE, ; YPEG, ; YPEGM, .