Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Transplant. 2017 Oct 15;31(11):10.1111/ctr.13107. doi: 10.1111/ctr.13107

TABLE 3.

Univariate and multivariable analyzes of predictors of “no hepatocellular carcinoma on explant”

Predictor variables Odds ratio (95% CI) P-value
Univariate analysis
Age
 <50 vs ≥50 16.88 (7.49–38.00) <.001
 <55 vs ≥55 5.83 (2.78–12.21) <.001
 <60 vs ≥60 2.66 (1.2–5.74) .01
Female gender 2.40 (1.18–4.91) .02
African American (vs Caucasian) 2.64 (1.03–6.78) .04
Non-hepatitis C etiology (vs hepatitis C) 6.52 (2.63–16.20) <.001
Child-Pugh score (per point) 0.90 (0.76–1.07) .22
MELD score (per point) 1.02 (0.94–1.10) .69
AFP at listing
 <5 vs ≥5 3.21 (1.57–6.56) .001
 <10 vs ≥10 4.61 (1.86–11.43) <.001
 <20 vs ≥20 7.10 (1.67–30.26) .008
Tumor burden at listing
 1 lesion 3–5 cm (vs 1 lesion 2–2.9 cm) 0.77 (0.25–2.35) .64
 2 lesions (vs 1 lesion 2–2.9 cm) 0.99 (0.42–2.37) .99
 3 lesions (vs 1 lesion 2–2.9 cm) 1.54 (0.41–5.74) .52
 Median total tumor diameter <3 vs ≥3 cm 1.21 (0.56–2.61) .64
Wait time from listing to LT
 >3 vs ≤3 mo 1.28 (0.62–2.62) .50
 >6 vs ≤6 mo 1.14 (0.41–3.11) .81
 >12 vs ≤12 mo 1.69 (0.36–8.05) .51
UNOS regiona
 Region 2 vs all other regions 1.20 (0.40–3.66) .75
 Region 3 vs all other regions 1.74 (0.85–3.59) .13
 Region 10 vs all other regions 0.50 (0.15–1.69) .26
 Region 11 vs all other regions 0.24 (0.06–1.01) .052
Multivariate analysis
 Age <50 vs ≥50 17.30 (6.99–42.83) <.001
 Non-hepatitis C etiology (vs hepatitis C) 5.43 (1.94–15.20) .001
 AFP <10 vs ≥10 2.87 (1.02–8.06) .04
a

Only analyzed individual regions who had at least 20 patients of the entire cohort.