Skip to main content
. 2018 May;44(5):708–716. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.01.098

Table 2.

Demographics of participating units.

Unit characteristic N = 79
Types of breast reconstruction offered
Implant-based reconstruction 79 (100)
Pedicled flaps
Latissimus dorsi 76 (96)
Pedicled TRAM 31 (39)
Free flaps
DIEP 34 (43)
Other autologous (e.g SGAP, IGAP, TUG, SIEA) 24 (30)
Therapeutic mammoplasty 75 (95)
Revisional surgery 77 (97)
Number of staff performing breast and reconstructive surgery
Breast surgery
Number of consultant surgeons with an interest in breast surgery (FTE, median, IQR, range) 3.0
(2.0–3.8)
(0.0–7.0)
Number of consultant breast surgeons who perform reconstructive surgery (FTE, median, IQR, range) 2.5
(2.0–3.0)
(0.0–7.0)
Plastic surgery
Number of consultant plastic surgeons with an interest in breast surgery (FTE, median, IQR, range) 1.0
(0–3.0)
(0.0–21.0)
Number of consultant plastic surgeons who perform reconstructive surgery (FTE, median, IQR, range) 2.0
(1.0–3.0)
(0.0–10.0)
Number of immediate implant-based breast reconstructions performed per year (median, IQR, range) 35 (20–50)
(0–230)
Percentage of immediate breast reconstructions that are implant-based (median, IQR, range) 70.0 (50.0–80.0)
(0.0–100.0)
Approaches to implant-based reconstruction offered
Standard 2 stage submuscular placement 60 (75.9)
Reduction pattern with dermal sling 66 (83.5)
Acellular dermal matrix assisted reconstruction 59 (74.7)
Other non-dermal biological-assisted reconstruction 19 (24.1)
TiLOOP assisted reconstruction 19 (24.1)
Other synthetic assisted reconstruction 8 (10.1)

DIEP – deep inferior epigastric perforator; FTE – full time equivalent; IQR – interquartile range; TRAM – transverse rectus abdominis myocutaenous flap.