Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 7;236(5):1347–1355. doi: 10.1007/s00221-018-5221-7

Table 1.

Mean (SD) characteristics of correct pro- and anti-saccades for the match-approach (low cognitive control demand) and match-avoid (high cognitive control demand) versions of the eye-movement task

Task version Directional error, % Latency, ms Amplitude, degree visual angle
Low demand (match-approach)
Pro-saccade
 In-group 0.06 (0.01) 293 (66) 8.74 (0.85)
 Out-group 0.08 (0.01) 302 (58) 8.73 (0.91)
Anti-saccade
 In-group 0.47 (0.03) 473 (189) 7.65 (2.63)
 Out-group 0.51 (0.03) 476 (211) 7.55 (2.77)
High demand (match-avoid)
Pro-saccade
 In-group 0.17 (0.01) 409 (108) 8.45 (1.16)
 Out-group 0.19 (0.02) 423 (111) 8.14 (1.15)
Anti-saccade
 In-group 0.36 (0.03) 463 (99) 8.40 (2.50)
 Out-group 0.41 (0.03) 481 (102) 8.20 (2.16)