Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 May 15.
Published in final edited form as: Anal Biochem. 2018 Mar 2;549:12–20. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2018.03.003

Table 4.

Comparison of ETC Enzymatic Assay in Mononuclear Cells and Lymphocytes (nmole/min/mg)

References Our data (N=46)
Measures Berger I. Negari S.B. Drouet M. Rustin P.
CS NP 75 ND 47–114 54±2.8
SDH ND 15 ND ND 4.1± 0.3
I/III ND ND ND ND 13.4±0.8
II/III (Without antimycin A-sensitive) ND 20 24.3–32.9 23–46 11.2±0.7
II/III (With antimycin A-sensitive) 10.2±0.6
II−Q1 ND ND ND ND 1.9±0.1
II+Q1 ND ND ND ND 9.2±0.5
III ND ND 44.2–51.5 ND 37.7±3
IV 0.75±0.12* 80 49.4–50.1 69–146 1.2±0.1**
LDH ND ND ND 706–1656 533.8±30

ETC= electron transport chain; CS=citrate synthase; NP=Not provide; ND=Not determined; SDH=succinate dehydrogenase; I/III= rotenone-sensitive linked activity of complex I and III; II/III=antimycin Asensitive linked activity of complex II and III; II−Q1 and II+Q1=complex II activity as the thenoyltrifluoroacetone-sensitive without CoQ1 or with CoQ1; III= antimycin A-sensitive, complex III activity; IV= cytochrome c oxidase, complex IV activity ; LDH= lactate dehydrogenase;

*

= ratio of complex IV/CS;

**

= k−1/mg. A total of 46 samples were used for ETC analysis because the technician was on sick leave and not be able to perform 2 assays.