Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Sep 21.
Published in final edited form as: Mol Psychiatry. 2017 Nov 7;23(7):1606–1613. doi: 10.1038/mp.2017.216

Table 4.

Comparison of altered gene pathways in DLPFC layer 3 PV cells and PCs in schizophrenia.

PV cell analysis PC analysis
Pathway DEGs in pathway* p-value % DEGs decreased DEGs in pathway* p-value % DEGs decreased
Oxidative Phosphorylation 22 (24.2%) < 10−5 90.9% 61 (67%) < 10−34 100%
Mitochondrial Dysfunction 27 (19.1%) < 10−4 88.9% 73 (51.8%) < 10−30 100%
Tight Junction Signaling 21 (20%) < 10−3 57.1 % 16 (14.8%) 0.21 81.3%
Protein Ubiquitination Pathway 20 (9.9%) 0.26 55% 55 (24.4%) < 10−7 92.7%
EIF2 Signaling 10 (6.2%) 1 60% 41 (24.4%) < 10−5 90.2%
Clathrin-mediated Endocytosis Signaling 20 (15.5%) 0.006 55% 31 (25%) < 10−4 87.1%
Superpathway of Cholesterol Biosynthesis 2 (9.1%) 0.57 100% 10 (43.5%) < 10−3 100%
Regulation of Actin-based Motility by Rho 14 (21.9%) < 10−3 78.6% 16 (28.6%) < 10−3 87.5%
Pyrimidine Deoxyribonucleotides De Novo Biosynthesis I 0 (0%) 1 0% 7 (46.7%) < 10−3 85.7%
*

Number and % of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in each pathway. Bolded values represent pathways significant at a 5% FDR.