Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Urology. 2018 Feb 5;114:114–120. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.01.030

Table 2.

Mean trainee performance across trials and results of linear regression analysis.

Performance Metrics* Trial
1
Trial
2
Trial
3
Trial
4
Estimate (95%
CI)
P-
value*
Operation Specific Metrics
Clamp Times (minutes) 20.5 16.2 14.6 13.8 −2.2 (−2.9, −1.4) <0.001
Positive Margins (%)** 29% 29% 21% 4% 0.53 (0.29,0.89) 0.024
Proportion Renal Parenchyma Preserved (grams/grams) 0.98 0.97 0.97 0.97 −0.002 (−0.0038, −0.0003) 0.025
NASA Task Load Index (0–100)
Mental Demand 65.5 54.3 54.5 43.7 −6.7 (−8.9, −4.5) <0.001
Physical Demand 42.4 42.0 39.1 37.4 −1.8 (−4.0, 0.5) 0.130
Temporal Demand 57.5 51.7 47.5 41.4 −5.2 (−7.5, −3.0) <0.001
Performance (Failure = 100) 45.5 39.2 35.8 31.2 −4.6 (−7.4, −1.9) <0.001
Hard Work 62.5 55.2 55.0 49.1 −4.0 (−7.2, −0.9) 0.014
Frustration 43.3 42.3 38.3 33.0 −3.5 (−6.4, −0.6) 0.020
GEARS Score (0–5)
Depth Perception 3.33 - - 4.08 0.8 (0.4, 1.1) 0.001
Bimanual Dexterity 2.96 - - 3.79 0.8 (0.5, 1.1) <0.001
Efficiency 3.04 - - 3.79 0.8 (0.4, 1.1) <0.001
Force Sensitivity 2.88 - - 3.50 0.6 (0.2, 1.0) 0.006
Autonomy 3.50 - - 4.04 0.5 (0.5, 0.8) <0.001
Robotic Control 2.92 - - 3.83 0.9 (0.9, 1.2) <0.001
*

Multilevel multivariable linear and logistic regression models were used to test the association of performance metrics against the independent variables, trial number and experience level.

**

Positive margins represent the only binary variable, and the “Estimate” column is the odds ratio from logistic regression in this case.