Table 1.
Study | Year of publication | Country | Patients | Nodules | Average age | Study design | Reference standard | Sensitivity | Specificity | PPV | NPV | ACC |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ko et al. [20] | 2014 | Korea | 195 | 204 | 51 | retrospective | Cytology and histology | 0.985 | 0.158 | 0.354 | 0.957 | 0.422 |
Zhang et al. [21] | 2015 | China | 2,921 | 3,980 | 51.6 | prospective | Cytology, histology and US follow-up | 0.974 | 0.91 | 0.396 | 0.998 | 0.913 |
Srinivas et al. [22] | 2016 | India | 365 | 365 | 33.1 | prospective | Cytology and histology | 0.96 | 0.926 | 0.49 | 0.997 | 0.929 |
Yoon ATA et al. [24] | 2016 | Korea | 1,241 | 1,293 | 50.8 | retrospective | Cytology and histology | 0.974 | 0.293 | 0.233 | 0.981 | 0.416 |
Sun et al. [25] | 2017 | China | 1,293 | 388 | 49.5 | retrospective | Cytology, histology, and US follow-up | 0.987 | 0.307 | 0.473 | 0.973 | 0.57 |
Yoon et al. [23] | 2016 | Korea | 4,585 | 4,696 | 50.9 | retrospective | Cytology and histology | 0.988 | 0.255 | 0.275 | 0.986 | 0.418 |
PPV positive predictive value, NPV negative predictive value, ACC diagnostic accuracy