Table 7.
Concurrent and longitudinal predicting effects of parent-child subsystem qualities on Internet addiction.
Model | Predictors | Concurrent predicting effects | Longitudinal predicting effects | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Wave 2 Internet addictiona | Wave 3 Internet addictionb | Wave 2 Internet addictionc | Wave 3 Internet addictionc | ||||||||||
β | t | Cohen's f2 | β | t | Cohen's f2 | β | t | Cohen's f2 | β | T | Cohen's f2 | ||
1 | Genderd | 0.04 | 1.79∧ | 0.001 | 0.05 | 2.63** | 0.003 | 0.04 | 1.79∧ | 0.001 | 0.05 | 2.63** | 0.003 |
FESe | 0.01 | 0.22 | 0.000 | −0.04 | −1.78∧ | 0.001 | 0.01 | 0.22 | 0.000 | −0.04 | −1.78∧ | 0.001 | |
FIf | −0.02 | −1.08 | 0.000 | 0.02 | 0.73 | 0.000 | −0.02 | −1.08 | 0.000 | 0.02 | 0.73 | 0.000 | |
R2 change | 0.002 | 0.004 | 0.002 | 0.004 | |||||||||
F change | 1.451 | 3.29* | 1.451 | 3.29* | |||||||||
2 | PBC | −0.12 | −4.46*** | 0.008 | −0.08 | −3.00** | 0.003 | −0.08 | −3.03** | 0.003 | −0.03 | −1.18 | 0.001 |
PPC | 0.11 | 5.17*** | 0.010 | 0.15 | 7.29*** | 0.020 | 0.10 | 4.98*** | 0.009 | 0.08 | 3.67*** | 0.005 | |
FCRQ | −0.05 | −1.89∧ | 0.001 | −0.04 | −1.36 | 0.001 | −0.08 | −2.75** | 0.003 | −0.08 | −3.02** | 0.003 | |
R2 change | 0.035 | 0.034 | 0.029 | 0.017 | |||||||||
F change | 31.23*** | 30.85*** | 25.91*** | 15.04*** | |||||||||
3 | MBC | −0.01 | −0.50 | 0.000 | −0.03 | −1.18 | 0.001 | −0.04 | −1.56 | 0.001 | −0.04 | −1.35 | 0.001 |
MPC | 0.12 | 5.85*** | 0.013 | 0.15 | 6.95*** | 0.019 | 0.10 | 4.77*** | 0.009 | 0.06 | 2.79** | 0.003 | |
MCRQ | −0.13 | −4.72*** | 0.009 | −0.06 | −2.11* | 0.002 | −0.09 | −3.37** | 0.004 | −0.08 | −2.81** | 0.003 | |
R2 change | 0.040 | 0.032 | 0.026 | 0.015 | |||||||||
F change | 36.75*** | 28.89*** | 23.61*** | 13.27*** | |||||||||
4 | PBC | −0.11 | −4.08*** | 0.006 | −0.07 | −2.53** | 0.002 | −0.06 | −2.21* | 0.002 | −0.02 | −0.51 | 0.000 |
PPC | 0.06 | 2.68** | 0.003 | 0.11 | 4.53*** | 0.008 | 0.07 | 3.21** | 0.004 | 0.07 | 2.81** | 0.003 | |
FCRQ | −0.01 | −0.41 | 0.000 | −0.02 | −0.61 | 0.000 | −0.05 | −1.71∧ | 0.001 | −0.06 | −2.07* | 0.002 | |
MBC | 0.03 | 1.19 | 0.001 | 0.002 | 0.08 | 0.000 | −0.02 | −0.60 | 0.000 | −0.03 | −0.90 | 0.000 | |
MPC | 0.09 | 3.88*** | 0.006 | 0.09 | 3.94*** | 0.006 | 0.06 | 2.59* | 0.003 | 0.02 | 1.02 | 0.000 | |
MCRQ | −0.11 | −4.08*** | 0.006 | −0.05 | −1.85∧ | 0.001 | −0.07 | −2.48* | 0.002 | −0.06 | −2.04* | 0.002 | |
R2 change | 0.054 | 0.045 | 0.038 | 0.022 | |||||||||
F change | 24.67*** | 20.74*** | 17.12*** | 9.95*** |
For models 2–4, social-demographic variables were controlled. FES, Family economic status; FI, Family intactness; PBC, Paternal behavioral control; PPC, Paternal psychological control; FCRQ, Father-child relational quality; MBC, Maternal behavioral control; MPC, Maternal psychological control; MCRQ, Mather-child relational quality.
Parent-child subsystem qualities measured at Wave 2 were used.
Parent-child subsystem qualities measured at Wave 3 were used.
Parent-child subsystem qualities measured at Wave 1 were used.
Female = 1, Male = 1.
Having economic disadvantage = −1, Not having economic disadvantage = 1.
Non-intact = −1, Intact = 1.
p < 0.10.
p < 0.05.
p < 0.01.
p < 0.001.