Skip to main content
. 2018 May 1;12:290. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00290

Table 2.

Optimized parameters and prediction accuracy of SVR-LSM and SVR-MLSM models.

Model Baseline MoCA Year 1 MoCA
Prediction accuracy p Parameters Prediction accuracy p Parameters
SVR-LSM with AIL Linear - no volume control 0.4062 <0.001 c = 2−13 0.3788 <0.001 c = 2−10
Linear - voxelwise normalization 0.2813 0.014 c = 4 0.3418 0.003 c = 2
Linear - total volume regressed out* 0.2753 0.016 c = 2−11 0.1642 0.156 c = 2−3
Nonlinear - voxelwise normalization 0.3715 <0.001 γ = 8, c = 2−20 0.3648 0.001 γ = 8, c = 2−20
MLSM with AIL and WMH Linear - no volume control 0.3097 0.007 c = 2−17 0.4033 <0.001 c = 2−12
Linear - voxelwise normalization 0.2509 0.029 c = 0.25 0.2899 0.011 c = 0.5
Linear - total volumes regressed out 0.2538 0.027 c = 2−16 0.1818 0.116 c = 2−16
*

The total lesion burden of AIL was regressed out from the baseline and year 1 MoCA in this SVR-LSM model.

The total volume of AIL and that of WMH were regressed out from the baseline and year 1 MoCA in this SVR-MLSM model.