Skip to main content
. 2018 May;24(5):916–919. doi: 10.3201/eid2405.171506

Table 1. Percentages of antimicrobial drug resistance in selected bacterial species in wound infections, Ghana, 2014*.

Drug % Resistant
Staphylococcus aureus, n = 31 Enterococcus faecalis, n = 21 Proteus mirabilis, n = 20 Escherichia coli, n = 19 Klebsiella pneumoniae, n = 13 Enterobacter cloacae complex, n = 10 Pseudomonas aeruginosa, n = 20 Acinetobacter. baumannii complex, n = 8
PEN 93.5
AMP 0 70.0 94.7 100 100
OXA 0
SAM 0 45.0 82.2 69.2 100
TZP 0 10.5 46.2 30.0 10.0
CXM 5.0 57.9 46.2 80.0
CTX 5.0 47.4 46.2 40.0
CAZ 5.0 47.4 46.2 40.0 5.0 37.5†
IPM 0 0
MEM 0 0 0 0 5.0 0
ERY 3.2 100
CLI 3.2 100
TET 67.7 100
GEN 3.2 15.0 46.2 46.2 40.0 10.0 62.5
AMI 0 0
CIP 20.0 46.2 46.2 30.0 15.0 37.5
LVX 0
SXT 32.3 100 75.0 69.2 69.2 50.0
FOF 0
RIF 0
VAN 0 0

*Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed with VITEK 2 (bioMérieux, Marcy-l'Étoile, France) according to the EUCAST breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs, version 4.0, 2014 (7). Blank cells indicate no testing performed. AMI, amikacin; AMP, ampicillin; CAZ, ceftazidime; CIP, ciprofloxacin; CLI, clindamycin; CTX, cefotaxime; CXM, cefuroxime; ERY, erythromycin; FOF, fosfomycin; GEN, gentamicin; IPM, imipenem; LVX, levofloxacin; MEM, meropenem; OXA, oxacillin; PEN, penicillin; RIF, rifampin; SAM, ampicillin/sulbactam; SXT, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole; TET, tetracycline; TZP, piperacillin/tazobactam; VAN, vancomycin.
†The interpretation of the CAZ MIC for A. baumannii complex followed the recommendations of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing (8).